On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 11:33 AM Steffen Schwalm <Steffen.Schwalm@msg.group>
wrote:

> I strongly oppose against moving forward the specification as Issues still
> open.
>
>
>
>    1. There´s no documented decision on the well-known x509 issue –
>    beside the wishes of the authors
>
>
Having seen and participated in discussion of the issue on the mailing
list, at "unofficial" events with WG participants, and at official events
with WG participants - the decision was very clearly based on the wishes of
the rough consensus of the WG participants. Speaking as an individual, of
course.




>    1.
>    2. Still wait for information from chairs where and how to solve issue
>    when not in TokenStatusList
>    3. Means TokenStatusList contains privacy issue in case used for
>    Attestatiosn of attributes in eIDAS
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Kristina Yasuda <yasudakrist...@gmail.com>
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 2. April 2025 00:22
> *An:* ANTHONY NADALIN <nada...@prodigy.net>
> *Cc:* torsten=40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org; oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
> *Betreff:* [OAUTH-WG] Re: Second WGLC for Token Status List
>
>
>
> *Caution:* This email originated from outside of the organization.
> Despite an upstream security check of attachments and links by Microsoft
> Defender for Office, a residual risk always remains. Only open attachments
> and links from known and trusted senders.
>
> I support moving this specification forward. It is a crucial building
> block for lifecycle management of different tokens/credentials.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:42 PM ANTHONY NADALIN <nada...@prodigy.net>
> wrote:
>
> support this moving forward as we need this in ISO
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* torsten=40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org <torsten=
> 40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 1, 2025 11:38:22 AM
> *To:* oauth <oauth@ietf.org>; Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Re: Second WGLC for Token Status List
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I support moving this spec forward.
>
>
>
> best regards,
>
> Torsten.
>
> Am 24. März 2025, 13:41 +0100 schrieb Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <
> rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com>:
>
> All,
>
> This is a *second WG Last Call* for the *Token Status List* document:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list/
>
> Please, review this document and reply on the mailing list if you have any
> comments or concerns, by *April 7th*.
>
> Regards,
>   Rifaat & Hannes
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
>

-- 
_CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to