[OAUTH-WG] [IANA #1416059] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt (media-type-structured-suffix)

Dear Alexey Melnikov, Darrel Miller (cc: oauth WG), As the designated experts for the Structured Syntax Suffixes registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt-17 for us? Please see: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-selective-dis

[OAUTH-WG] [Errata Verified] RFC7519 (8060)

The following errata report has been verified for RFC7519, "JSON Web Token (JWT)". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8060 -- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Pieter

[OAUTH-WG] Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt non-selectively disclosable claims

thanks Chad, I put in https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/issues/563 so as not to lose track of this On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 7:19 AM Chad Parry wrote: > The phrase "non-selectively disclosable claims" confused me. At first I > interpreted it to mean "claims that are disclos

[OAUTH-WG] Re: [IANA #1416058] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt (jwt)

Thanks Filip, I think your observations about "..." are correct. It doesn't necessarily need to be registered and isn't even strictly speaking a claim name. We talked about this some (poorly captured in this issue /315 ) and de

[OAUTH-WG] Re: draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt embedding rules

If it's OK, I have follow-ups below. On 4/3/25 12:56, Daniel Fett wrote: > Hi Chad, > > Thank you for your review of the specification! My comments below: > > Am 03.04.25 um 08:57 schrieb Chad Parry: > > The ellipsis name was introduced in version 5 of the specification, > > but the "_sd" name