Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client Assertions

2010-08-09 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
ian Campbell; oauth > Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client > Assertions > > So how do we resolve if the language goes into the spec? > Thanks, > Yaron > > > -Original Message- > > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client Assertions

2010-08-09 Thread Yaron Goland
oauth > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client > Assertions > > Makes sense. Personally, I don't have any preference on including it or not. > > EHL > > > -Original Message- > > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oa

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client Assertions

2010-07-27 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client > Assertions > > A client_id parameter would still be presented in the end user authorization > request. The text Brian E. quoted is what mandates any > specifications/documents/agreements that define how to use client > as

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client Assertions

2010-07-27 Thread Brian Campbell
A client_id parameter would still be presented in the end user authorization request. The text Brian E. quoted is what mandates any specifications/documents/agreements that define how to use client assertions must also define the association between the client_id and some field(s) in the assertion.

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client Assertions

2010-07-26 Thread Brian Eaton
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > How do you link the client_id using in the authorization endpoint with the > client assertion using in the token endpoint? In theory: "any document that defines how to use an assertion of a particular type with OAuth 2.0 MUST define ho

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client Assertions

2010-07-26 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
n Goland; oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client > Assertions > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav > wrote: > > I understand that in many assertions, the client identifier is > > established internally, but this

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client Assertions

2010-07-26 Thread Brian Eaton
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > I understand that in many assertions, the client identifier is established > internally, but this approach will completely prevent using the assertion > client authentication method with other flows that involve getting a code. I'm prett

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed language for section 2.2 on Client Assertions

2010-07-26 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
By not incorporating the client_id parameter, you are preventing this client authentication mode from being used with the end-user authorization endpoint. In -09 I tried to separate the client_id from the client_secret, basically moving the client_id to the token endpoint as an endpoint paramete