Mike if you subscribe to the mailing list your opinion counts towards
consensus. I am sure you are well aware that the IETF doesn’t vote in WG.
Do you object to the specific initial values in the registry or the notion of
having a IANA registry for the values.
You are also free to contribute
OAuth Guru's,
I know you are all going to approve this AMR spec anyway, but I'd just
like to dissent. I think this specification is useless, and potentially
harmful.
Just as an example--two domains that use "face" as the amr probably have
totally different algorithms, sensitivities, training
+1 for adoption as WG document
Note: AMRs are mainly intended to be used in OIDC context. e.g. the
MODRNA WG refers to this spec. The document should clearly state that.
Am 03.03.2016 08:43, schrieb Vladimir Dzhuvinov:
> +1 to have the AMR spec adopted
>
> On 03/03/16 03:20, John Bradley
+1 to have the AMR spec adopted
On 03/03/16 03:20, John Bradley wrote:
> +1 for adoption still
> On Mar 2, 2016 10:18 PM, "Phil Hunt (IDM)" wrote:
>
>> +1 for adoption. Again.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 17:03, William Denniss wrote:
>>
>> I support adoption of this specification by the
+1 for adoption still
On Mar 2, 2016 10:18 PM, "Phil Hunt (IDM)" wrote:
> +1 for adoption. Again.
>
> Phil
>
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 17:03, William Denniss wrote:
>
> I support adoption of this specification by the working group.
>
> We are already using some values in production and I see interope
+1 for adoption. Again.
Phil
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 17:03, William Denniss wrote:
>
> I support adoption of this specification by the working group.
>
> We are already using some values in production and I see interoperability
> advantages in having these standardized.
>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 20
I support adoption of this specification by the working group. Aspects of it
are already being used in production by Google and Microsoft. It is also
normatively referenced by the mobile profile for OpenID Connect being produced
by the OpenID MODRNA working group.
+1 to adopt.
My previous concerns of this draft have been addressed, and I am supportive
of having an IANA registry of amr values.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote:
> In response to my message to the list regarding the initial call for
> adopt
