+1 to adopt. My previous concerns of this draft have been addressed, and I am supportive of having an IANA registry of amr values.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Hannes Tschofenig < hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote: > In response to my message to the list regarding the initial call for > adoption of the Authentication Method Reference Values draft, see > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15694.html, Mike > submitted an updated version of the document to take raised concerns > into account. Several working group participants responded positively to > the new version. > > We would therefore like to issue a 2nd call for adoption of the recently > submitted version -05: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05 > > Please let us know by March 3rd whether you accept / object to the > adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth > working group. > > Ciao > Hannes & Derek > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
