2010/10/29 John Panzer :
> I think that it would be good to have a writeup like this that describes the
> differences and pros and cons of each approach. Perhaps on a Wiki page?
Feel free to copy this to a wiki page:
1) Server-side requirements:
- XRD/Webfinger: creating .well-known, placing a st
I think that it would be good to have a writeup like this that describes the
differences and pros and cons of each approach. Perhaps on a Wiki page?
Some random thoughts:
One thing: host-meta is highly cacheable, so the # of round trips will
hopefully be comparable for large services with signif
Hello!
This draft is looking nice, the idea and specification is simple and
straightforward. I would like to draw the connection to other
discovery approaches.
The introductory example in the draft was this one:
GET
/.well-known/simple-web-discovery?principal=mailto:j...@example.com&service=urn:a
These posts of Yaron's outline the basic vision and flows:
http://www.goland.org/adhocauthentication/
http://www.goland.org/oauthgenericdelegation/
We hope to also come out with a description in Internet-draft style soon to
provide concrete details about possible i
On 2010-10-26, at 4:33 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> Having a simple discovery method for services and resources is key to
> enabling many Internet scenarios that require interactions among parties that
> do not have pre-established relationships. For instance, if Joe, with e-mail
> address j...@ex
Having a simple discovery method for services and resources is key to enabling
many Internet scenarios that require interactions among parties that do not
have pre-established relationships. For instance, if Joe, with e-mail address
j...@example.com, wants to share his calendar with Mary, then
