> Chairs - please open an issue for this: "Clarifying reference to refresh
> tokens
> in section 1.4.3 of -20".
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/trac/ticket/25
b
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
ietf.org
> Subject: AW: [OAUTH-WG] Partial set of last call comments on OAuth draft 20
> from Yaron Goland
>
> >> 1.4.3. Resource Owner Password Credentials: Comment on "(when
> >> combined with a refresh token)": "This is the first time that refresh
> &
; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Partial set of last call comments on OAuth draft 20
from Yaron Goland
1.4.3. Resource Owner Password Credentials: Comment on "(when
combined with a refresh token)": "This is the first time that refresh
tokens are mentioned in the spec. And
Agree, against the removal of text
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Lodderstedt, Torsten
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 1:01 AM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Partial set of last call comments on
>> 1.4.3. Resource Owner Password Credentials: Comment on "(when
>> combined with a refresh token)": "This is the first time that refresh tokens
>> are mentioned in the spec. And yet there is no explanation of what they are.
>> I suspect they should anyway be introduced in section 1.4.1 (as previo
This is fantastic feedback. Some parts moved to new threads.
> -Original Message-
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Mike Jones
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 2:39 PM
> 1.4. Authorization Grant: Change "resource owner authorization" to
> "res
