On 2019-05-06 2:35 p.m., Neil Madden wrote:
> I don’t know the relative merits of Link headers vs .well-known, but
> there is at least one other draft standard I know of that is going
> down the .well-known route for this kind of thing (password changes in
> this case):
>
> https://github.com/WICG/
I don’t know the relative merits of Link headers vs .well-known, but there is
at least one other draft standard I know of that is going down the .well-known
route for this kind of thing (password changes in this case):
https://github.com/WICG/change-password-url/blob/gh-pages/explainer.md
— Nei
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks for the hint. Will give that a shot!
Evert
On 2019-05-06 1:38 p.m., Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi Evert,
>
> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:41:50PM -0400, Evert Pot wrote:
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> I've been running into a number of situations where it would have been
>> beneficial to h
Hi Evert,
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:41:50PM -0400, Evert Pot wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I've been running into a number of situations where it would have been
> beneficial to have a few protocol/media-type agnositic link relation
> types for user authentication purposes.
>
> https://tools.ietf.o
Hi everyone!
I've been running into a number of situations where it would have been
beneficial to have a few protocol/media-type agnositic link relation
types for user authentication purposes.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pot-authentication-link
Nothing here is coupled to OAuth, but the lin
