Hi Benjamin, Thanks for the hint. Will give that a shot!
Evert On 2019-05-06 1:38 p.m., Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Hi Evert, > > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:41:50PM -0400, Evert Pot wrote: >> Hi everyone! >> >> I've been running into a number of situations where it would have been >> beneficial to have a few protocol/media-type agnositic link relation >> types for user authentication purposes. >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pot-authentication-link >> >> Nothing here is coupled to OAuth, but the link relations could >> potentially be used with OAuth2 servers. >> >> I don't exactly know the IETF process, but I thought it would be a good >> idea to ask for feedback here. My understanding is that either I should >> find an appropriate WG that's willing to adopt it, or I could do an >> individual submission. I'm not entirely sure yet which would be the most >> appropriate WG to ask, so I thought I'd start here. > You may want to ask for feedback on a...@ietf.org > (https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art) as well -- there are several > folks there that have deep expertise in link relations and could advise on > what these proposals might (or might not) be suitable for. > > There are a few other security-area WGs (than OAuth) that work in > authentication (though maybe not as directly in the HTTP world), so once > you get some ART feedback it may be worth raising the issue on the > secdispatch mailing list as well > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/secdispatch/about/). > > Thanks, > > Ben _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
