Re: [OAUTH-WG] Invalidating access tokens

2010-03-04 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
I don't buy the argument that future security should be modelled after the broken security we have today. EHL On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:55, "David Recordon" wrote: > Copying over a discussion from comments on my blog... > http://daveman692.livejournal.com/349384.html?thread=1117640#t1117640 > > M

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Invalidating access tokens

2010-03-04 Thread Brian Eaton
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, David Recordon wrote: > Mart Atkins: >> Doing short-lived access tokens in cleartext is not really any different to >> how most sites >> handle sessions today. A short-lived access token isn't much different than >> a session key. Yep. This is not an accident,

[OAUTH-WG] Invalidating access tokens

2010-03-04 Thread David Recordon
Copying over a discussion from comments on my blog... http://daveman692.livejournal.com/349384.html?thread=1117640#t1117640 Mart Atkins: > Doing short-lived access tokens in cleartext is not really any different to > how most sites > handle sessions today. A short-lived access token isn't much di