:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Murray S. Kucherawy
>> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 6:52 AM
>> To: oauth@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer
>> Spec
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> F
ubject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer
> Spec
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> > Of Eran Hammer
> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 12:19 AM
> > To: SM
>
> -Original Message-
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Eran Hammer
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 12:19 AM
> To: SM
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer Spec
>
>
stor.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 12:00 AM
> To: Eran Hammer
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer
> Spec
>
> Hi Eran,
> At 16:04 09-05-2012, Eran Hammer wrote:
> >The IESG members rely on the editor to represe
Hi Eran,
At 16:04 09-05-2012, Eran Hammer wrote:
The IESG members rely on the editor to represent the WG decisions to
them when addressing issues. You failed to do that, promoted your
personal view, and now we are having this discussion all over again
- a discussion that last time was only reso
+1
On 5/9/12 6:27 PM, John Bradley wrote:
Consistent syntax across bearer, core and MAC.
That wasn't one of the options:)
John B.
On 2012-05-09, at 6:06 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
Hi all,
another issue that came up in Sean's IESG review was about the encoding of the
error / error_descrip
M
> To: Eran Hammer; Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer
> Spec
>
> Per the earlier correction to my typo, the DISCUSS was on the bearer spec. It
> asked me to reference syntax restrictions for scope and
icrosoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:41 PM
> To: Eran Hammer; Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the
> Bearer Spec
>
> There was a DISCUSS on the core spec asking us to cite the character
> set rest
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:41 PM
> To: Eran Hammer; Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer
> Spec
>
> There was a DISCUSS on the core spec asking us to cite the character set
> restrictions for scope and
bject: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer Spec
Hi all,
another issue that came up in Sean's IESG review was about the encoding of
the error / error_description / error_uri in the base and in the bearer
specification.
As mentioned in my earlier mail about the registr
h affects both specs.
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eran
Hammer
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:35 PM
To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer Spec
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eran
Hammer
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:35 PM
To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer Spec
I am confused by the process here.
The
alf
> Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:07 PM
> To: oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer Spec
>
> Hi all,
>
> another issue that came up in Sean's IESG review was about the encoding of
> the er
Consistent syntax across bearer, core and MAC.
That wasn't one of the options:)
John B.
On 2012-05-09, at 6:06 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> another issue that came up in Sean's IESG review was about the encoding of
> the error / error_description / error_uri in the base and in t
+1
>
> From: Mike Jones
>To: Hannes Tschofenig ; "oauth@ietf.org WG"
>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:15 PM
>Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer Spec
>
>2) Consist
of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer Spec
Hi all,
another issue that came up in Sean's IESG review was about the encoding of the
error / error_description / error_uri in the base and in the bearer
specification.
As mentioned in my earlier mail about the registry for the error codes
Hi all,
another issue that came up in Sean's IESG review was about the encoding of the
error / error_description / error_uri in the base and in the bearer
specification.
As mentioned in my earlier mail about the registry for the error codes there
are three error fields defined in the two spe
17 matches
Mail list logo
