Don't know. In the 5 RFCs I've worked on, I - as editor - was the only personal who interacted with the IESG. Either way, it is usually the editor who is addressing questions about the text and proposing changes.
EH > -----Original Message----- > From: SM [mailto:s...@resistor.net] > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 12:00 AM > To: Eran Hammer > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer > Spec > > Hi Eran, > At 16:04 09-05-2012, Eran Hammer wrote: > >The IESG members rely on the editor to represent the WG decisions to > >them when addressing issues. You failed to do that, promoted your > >personal view, and now we are having this discussion all over again > >- a discussion that last time was only resolved by creating the design > >committee. > > Isn't it up the Document Shepherd to coordinate the resolution of DISCUSS > or COMMENT items? > > Regards, > -sm _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
