Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today

2013-01-19 Thread Mike Jones
Mike > > -Original Message- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Stephen Farrell > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:47 AM > To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Tex

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today

2013-01-19 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hi Hannes, On 01/19/2013 04:19 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback. I see that a couple of you have decided to go with > option 2. Yep, looks like it. I've moved this back to Feb 7 so the discussion doesn't need to be rushed. S. __

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today

2013-01-19 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
> -Original Message- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Stephen Farrell > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:47 AM > To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text a

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today

2013-01-18 Thread John Bradley
cases. > > > > Thanks all, > -- Mike > > -Original Message----- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Stephen Farrell > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:47 AM &

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today

2013-01-18 Thread Chuck Mortimore
es Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 2:31 PM To: Stephen Farrell; Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) Cc: oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today I can't agree with proceeding with Hannes' rewrite of the interope

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today

2013-01-18 Thread Brian Campbell
e > > -Original Message- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Mike Jones > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 2:31 PM > To: Stephen Farrell; Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draf

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today

2013-01-18 Thread Mike Jones
uth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:47 AM To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today Hiya, So I'll take the lack of fur

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today

2013-01-18 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hiya, So I'll take the lack of further discussion about this an meaning that the wg want this to shoot ahead. I'll put this in as an RFC editor note for the draft. Cheers, S. On 01/18/2013 12:04 PM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote: > Hi all, > > As you have seen on the list (see > h

[OAUTH-WG] Assertion Draft: Text about Interoperability -- Today

2013-01-18 Thread Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
Hi all, As you have seen on the list (see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg10526.html) I had a chat with Mike about how to address my comment for the assertion draft and Mike kindly provided his text proposal (see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg10529.ht