; >both random-hex tokens and signed JWTs is equally powerful. The fact
> >that I can reuse 90% of that code and also get signed MAC tokens is
> >likewise powerful.
> >
> >Thus, I stand by my originally-suggested text and respectfully submit it
> >to the editor and workin
kewise powerful.
>
>Thus, I stand by my originally-suggested text and respectfully submit it
>to the editor and working group for consideration of inclusion in this
>section.
>
> -- Justin
>
>On 01/26/2012 12:49 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
>>
>>> -Original Messag
respectfully submit it
to the editor and working group for consideration of inclusion in this
section.
-- Justin
On 01/26/2012 12:49 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Justin Richer [mailto:jric...@mitre.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:07 AM
To: Eran Hammer
Cc:
ailto:jric...@mitre.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:07 AM
>> To: Eran Hammer
>> Cc: OAuth WG
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of -22 (part II)
>>
>> I realize that -23 is already published with the below text, but since this
>> is a
>> wh
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Richer [mailto:jric...@mitre.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:07 AM
> To: Eran Hammer
> Cc: OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of -22 (part II)
>
> I realize that -23 is already published with the below text
Yes Justin's rewording makes it sound less like non-interoperability is a
desired outcome.
On 2012-01-26, at 11:06 AM, Justin Richer wrote:
> I realize that -23 is already published with the below text, but since this
> is a whole new section and nobody else seemed to bring it up, I wanted to
I realize that -23 is already published with the below text, but since
this is a whole new section and nobody else seemed to bring it up, I
wanted to make sure it wasn't missed by the WG.
Suggested non-trivial clarifications:
-
(1) 1.3.4 - "previously arran
Same response as for part I from me,
S
On 01/21/2012 01:04 AM, Eran Hammer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Stephen Farrell
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:13 AM
Suggested non-trivial clarifications:
> -Original Message-
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Stephen Farrell
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:13 AM
> Suggested non-trivial clarifications:
> -
>
> (1) 1.3.4 - "previously arranged" might trigge
