Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-04

2012-05-08 Thread Gonzalo Salgueiro
Hannes: While I'm clearly honored by your interest in me and my activities, it is not my intent to artificially pump up a document on which I am a co-author. Everyone on this list knows I am an author on it as we have discussed it exhaustively for the past month and a half. I was merely indicat

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-04

2012-05-08 Thread Blaine Cook
On 8 May 2012 16:55, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > The discussions around XML vs. JSON are unfortunately also hiding the real > important discussion, namely privacy. > > We are actually building, without further thinking about it, a mechanism that > offers worse privacy properties compared to what

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-04

2012-05-08 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Gonzalo: it is great that you, as a co-author, support your own document but I don't think it is particular helpful. On May 4, 2012, at 10:49 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) wrote: > I support this doc being adopted as starting point for WG discussion. > > Regards, > > Gonzalo > > > On May

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-04

2012-05-04 Thread Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
I support this doc being adopted as starting point for WG discussion. Regards, Gonzalo On May 4, 2012, at 3:03 PM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" wrote: > The above-named draft has been offered as the recommended path forward in > terms of converging on a single document to advance through appsawg.