I can absolutely appreciate the "make it worth my while to wrestle w/
the RFC errata system " sentiment but am not in a position myself to spend
more time on errata right now.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 4:10 AM Deb Cooley wrote:
> Can I talk you into looking at the other three reported errata on th
Agreed -- I also support adoption.
-Brock
On 2/11/2025 10:20:35 AM, Dominick Baier wrote:
I support adoption.
On 7. February 2025 at 20:51:43, Michael Jones (michael_b_jo...@hotmail.com
[mailto:michael_b_jo...@hotmail.com]) wrote:
I obviously am in favor of adoption, as I believe we should
I support adoption.
On 7. February 2025 at 20:51:43, Michael Jones (michael_b_jo...@hotmail.com)
wrote:
I obviously am in favor of adoption, as I believe we should do the work to
close the identified security vulnerabilities in a timely manner. Thanks
to all who worked on this doc with me prio
Can I talk you into looking at the other three reported errata on that
RFC? (RFC 7519 and Erratas: 5906, 7720, and 8225)
To make it worth my while to wrestle w/ the RFC errata system...
Deb
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 5:56 PM Brian Campbell
wrote:
> Pieter said errata in July of last year and we'
Hi Daniel, Kristina, Brian,
here are a few review comments that are easy to address:
1. Complete the IANA registry section for the media type registrations.
Search for TBD in that section. As you make this change you might also
want to remove the RFC 2119 language from the description fields.
