On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 2:16 PM Brian Campbell
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 12:03 PM Watson Ladd wrote:
>>
>> What exactly does one do with an iss that has an HTTPS URL? Seems like
>> we say two different things must happen.
>
>
> Do you mean what is said in this issue
> https://github.c
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 12:03 PM Watson Ladd wrote:
> What exactly does one do with an iss that has an HTTPS URL? Seems like
> we say two different things must happen.
>
Do you mean what is said in this issue
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/281, which I assume was
inspired by y
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-oauth-status-list-06.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Web Authorization Protocol (OAUTH) WG of the IETF.
Title: Token Status List
Authors: Tobias Looker
Paul Bastian
Christian Bormann
Name:draft-ietf-oauth-status-list-0
What exactly does one do with an iss that has an HTTPS URL? Seems like
we say two different things must happen.
I'm also fuzzy on where the x5c appears. Is it a claim that has the
X509 certificate chain? More needs to be said about verification and
construction for interoperability, probably throu
If we look at the comments and thumbs up / down reactions in the
original PR in question, I think it's pretty clear what the "predominant
view" is:
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/251
Markus
On 12/3/24 4:23 PM, Michael Jones wrote:
Thanks for the explanation, Hannes.
For wh
All,
We cancelled the meeting for this week, because Hannes and I have conflicts
during this time.
Regards,
Rifaat
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 11:53 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote:
>
>
> Rifaat Shekh-Yusef canceled this Webex meeting.
>
> Wednesday, December 04, 2024
> 12:00 PM | (UTC-05:00) Eas
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 10.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:CANCEL
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
LAST-MODIFIED:20221105T024526Z
TZURL:https://www.tzurl.org/zoneinfo-outlook/America/New_York
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZNAME:EDT
TZOFFSETFR
Hi Mike,
as you mentioned relevant is consensus not alleged majority.
Von: Michael Jones
Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2024 16:24
An: Hannes Tschofenig ; oauth@ietf.org
Betreff: [OAUTH-WG] Re: Precipitous unreviewed change
Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. Desp
Thanks for the explanation, Hannes.
For what it's worth, it was my sense that the DID removal was made with rough
consensus of the working group, although there were a few vocal detractors.
When you make the consensus call at or after the virtual interim, as I see it,
the chairs should have th
Hi all,
We are happy to announce the publication of draft -08 of SD-JWT VC. The
changes, as noted in the document history [0], are listed below for your
convenience [1].
The notable update in this draft is the restoration of a line break after
the short paragraph in the "Issuer-signed JWT Verific
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc-08.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Web Authorization Protocol (OAUTH) WG of the IETF.
Title: SD-JWT-based Verifiable Credentials (SD-JWT VC)
Authors: Oliver Terbu
Daniel Fett
Brian Campbell
Name:draft-i
Hi Mike, Hi everyone,
Rifaat and I requested this change to be made. The PR reverts an earlier
modification to the document that was introduced without working group
consensus.
We plan to use the upcoming virtual interim meeting to discuss the topic
of DID resolution—specifically whether it belo
12 matches
Mail list logo
