Thanks for the explanation, Hannes.
For what it's worth, it was my sense that the DID removal was made with rough
consensus of the working group, although there were a few vocal detractors.
When you make the consensus call at or after the virtual interim, as I see it,
the chairs should have the expectation that you won't get unanimity. Hopefully
you'll go with the predominant view in the working group, despite potentially
vehement protestations that may occur.
Thank you,
-- Mike
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 12:42 AM
To: Michael Jones <michael_b_jo...@hotmail.com>; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Precipitous unreviewed change
Hi Mike, Hi everyone,
Rifaat and I requested this change to be made. The PR reverts an earlier
modification to the document that was introduced without working group
consensus.
We plan to use the upcoming virtual interim meeting to discuss the topic of DID
resolution-specifically whether it belongs in this document and, if so, what
the appropriate text should be.
At the conclusion of the discussion, we intend to make a consensus call to
finalize this topic.
Ciao
Hannes
Am 03.12.2024 um 00:01 schrieb Michael Jones:
I'm writing because I saw that
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/278 was created and merged
less than five hours later without working group review. That's not how things
are supposed to be done once a draft has been adopted by a working group.
I therefore request that that the editors revert this (reverting) change and
publish -08 without it until such time as the working group has reached
definitive consensus on this issue.
Thank you,
-- Mike
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to
oauth-le...@ietf.org<mailto:oauth-le...@ietf.org>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
