Re: [OAUTH-WG] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-14: (with COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Vittorio Bertocci
On the SHOULD on top of S4. There are pretty common situations in which failing to get a response from an API is an acceptable outcome, and presenting an interactive prompt isn't. A classic example is a background update that the client can use to proactively fetch fresh data, that isn't critical f

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-14: (with COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Vittorio Bertocci
Sorry, my email client ate the first line of my reply, which was *Thanks Murray for the comments!* On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:11 PM Vittorio Bertocci wrote: > On the SHOULD on top of S4. There are pretty common situations in which > failing to get a response from an API is an acceptable outcome

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-14: (with COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Hi Vittorio, thanks for the quick response. On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:11 PM Vittorio Bertocci < vittorio.berto...@okta.com> wrote: > On the SHOULD on top of S4. There are pretty common situations in which > failing to get a response from an API is an acceptable outcome, and > presenting an inter

[OAUTH-WG] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: (with COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to h

[OAUTH-WG] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-14: (with COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: (with COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Michael Jones
Thanks for reviewing the specification, Paul. The authors agree it is too late in the game to change the name of "nonce". FYI, I plan to dial into the telechat and listen in on mute, in case anyone wants to ask questions during the call. Best wishes,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Ext] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Amanda Baber
Hi Lars, About this registration modification question (see [AB]): -- DISCUSS: -- # GEN AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14 CC @larsegge

[OAUTH-WG] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: (with COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Paul Wouters via Datatracker
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-14: (with COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Brian Campbell
Thank you, Lars, for the review and ballot. I put together this small PR with updates for the comments/nits https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-step-up-authn-challenge/pull/4 On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 5:18 AM Lars Eggert via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Lars Eggert has entered the followi

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [IANA #1270468] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-dpop (oauth-parameters)

2023-04-12 Thread Justin Richer
Hi al — sorry, I missed these first couple emails entirely. Yes, I have read the document and I approve this registration. — Justin > On Apr 12, 2023, at 1:45 AM, Amanda Baber via RT > wrote: > > Hi Justin, > > Can you review this OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Metadata request before >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Brian Campbell
The smaller comments/nits are addressed in this PR https://github.com/danielfett/draft-dpop/pull/184/files On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 6:52 AM Brian Campbell wrote: > Thank you, Lars, for the review. I've endeavored to respond to your > comments, especially the Discuss item, inline below. And I will

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Brian Campbell
Thank you, Lars, for the review. I've endeavored to respond to your comments, especially the Discuss item, inline below. And I will soon make corresponding updates to the document source. On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 4:03 AM Lars Eggert via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Lars Eggert has ente

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-11

2023-04-12 Thread Lars Eggert
Christer, thank you for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Lars > On 23. Feb 2023, at 19:13, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Christer Holmberg > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Revi

[OAUTH-WG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-14: (with COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Plea

[OAUTH-WG] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-04-12 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www