Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-dpop/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Most of the SHOULDs here seem unsupported to me, in the sense that I'm not clear what interoperability breaks if I decide not to do what it says. Some prose about that would be helpful to include. I know this isn't the first OAUTH document I've reviewed, but I still find it strange that claim names are not quoted or in all-caps or something. In prose, they just look like typos to me. _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
