[OAUTH-WG] [IANA #1261154] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-rar (OAuth Parameters - OAuth Extensions Error)

2022-12-12 Thread Amanda Baber via RT
Hi Hannes, Can you sign off on this revision? This on on Thursday's IESG telechat agenda. thanks, Amanda On Thu Dec 08 21:53:58 2022, bcampb...@pingidentity.com wrote: > Thanks for catching that Hannes. I believe you are correct that a > copy-and-paste error went unnoticed. I have fixed the glit

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Justin Richer
Apologies, sending from the correct email account this time. Please do not reply to the other address. Thank you, — Justin On Dec 12, 2022, at 1:45 PM, Justin Richer mailto:jus...@richer.org>> wrote: Francesca, Thanks for the pointer! I read through the referenced RFC as well and I agree wi

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Brian Campbell
-19 has those changes. On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:23 AM Brian Campbell wrote: > Thank you for the review and ballot Lars. I believe we can easily > incorporate those suggestions. > > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 7:14 AM Lars Eggert via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > >> Lars Eggert h

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-rar-19.txt

2022-12-12 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF. Title : OAuth 2.0 Rich Authorization Requests Authors : Torsten Lodderstedt Just

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Brian Campbell
Thanks Francesca, I must admit that I was not aware of RFC9237. After a quick look, however, it really is intended for Ace and IoT (as you point out) and I don't believe I could write anything sufficiently meaningful about any similarities to this document to warrant inclusion. On Mon, Dec 12, 20

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Brian Campbell
Thank you for the review and ballot Lars. I believe we can easily incorporate those suggestions. On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 7:14 AM Lars Eggert via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: No Objection > > When r

[OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[OAUTH-WG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https:/

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15

2022-12-12 Thread Lars Eggert
Robert, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following discussion. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Nov 18, 2022, at 00:45, Robert Sparks wrote: > > > On 11/17/22 4:44 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: >> Apologies - an upload fumble left -00 empty. I'v