Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - TMI BFF

2021-05-12 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Thanks, Brian! I agree that this is the best course of action at this point. Regards, Rifaat On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:02 PM Brian Campbell wrote: > While I admit to being somewhat partial to the acronym, it's not for any > sound technical or informational reason. To be honest, before I beca

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - TMI BFF

2021-05-12 Thread Brian Campbell
While I admit to being somewhat partial to the acronym, it's not for any sound technical or informational reason. To be honest, before I became enamored with my own perceived cleverness of TMI-BFF, I also thought the use of "BFF" in the context of the draft wasn't quite appropriate. At this point,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-10: (with DISCUSS)

2021-05-12 Thread Vladimir Dzhuvinov
Hi all, In preparation for a new v11 of the draft the language regarding the adherence to privacy regulations was updated along the lines of Roman's suggestion (thanks for that!): """ The token introspection response can be used to transfer personal identifiable information (PII) from the