Hi all,

In preparation for a new v11 of the draft the language regarding the adherence to privacy regulations was updated along the lines of Roman's suggestion (thanks for that!):


"""

The token introspection response can be used to transfer personal identifiable information (PII) from the AS to the RS. The AS MUST conform to legal and jurisdictional constraints for the data transfer before any data is released to a particular RS. The details and determining of these constraints varies by jurisdiction and is outside the scope of this document.

"""


The diff for this edit is here:

https://github.com/oauthstuff/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response/commit/48911a1afff9f3120773a157c4e14cbf3aa9f3de#diff-c4d976e7848e055731f69102bf2d6e4e7cf7d997efc1f202eb3b940d44746274


The current doc:

https://github.com/oauthstuff/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response/blob/master/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response.xml


Vladimir

Vladimir Dzhuvinov

On 04/02/2021 16:40, Roman Danyliw wrote:
Hi! Rob!

-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth <oauth-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Robert Wilton via
Datatracker
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 6:20 AM
To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
Cc: oauth-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-
respo...@ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-
introspection-response-10: (with DISCUSS)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-10: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Thank you for this document.

I have a  couple of process related questions regarding the legal aspects
considered in chapter 9 on privacy that I would like to discuss with the other
ADs on the telechat (hence raising it as a Discuss).

My two questions are:

(1) Is it appropriate for an RFC to specifying requirements relating to legal
issues and laws?  Note, I think that the guidance that is provides is really
helpful and should be included in the document, but I'm a bit concerned as to
whether a standards track RFC should be stating formal
requirements/constraints related to enforcing legal requirements rather that
providing non-normative guidance.

(2) Related to the first question, if the IESG believes believes that providing
such requirements is okay, a further question is whether using RFC 2119
language is appropriate, or whether this should use regular English?

An example from section 9:

    The AS MUST ensure a
    legal basis exists for the data transfer before any data is released
    to a particular RS.  The way the legal basis is established might
    vary among jurisdictions and MUST consider the legal entities
    involved.
I can see your point.  I believe this language is here to make a very strong 
statement on the needed for operational policies that conform to the variety of 
privacy laws which often governs some of this data.

I'll let the authors/co-chairs comment.  To start the discussion, let me 
propose rough text that dilutes the legal mandate a bit but tries to keep the 
spirit of the intent.

NEW
The AS MUST conform to jurisdictional constraints for the data transfer before 
any data is released to a particular RS.  These constraints will vary by 
jurisdictions; and their details and determining which apply to this release to 
RSs is outside the scope of this document.

Regards,
Roman



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to