Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 7628 on A Set of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms for OAuth

2015-09-01 Thread Justin Richer
Hooray, congratulations! — Justin > On Sep 1, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Bill Mills wrote: > > And thank you Hannes for all the guidance and being a great collaborator on > this! > > And to the WG, chairs, and shepherds, we did something good here. Thank you > all for the review, attention, time,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: RFC 7628 on A Set of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms for OAuth

2015-09-01 Thread Bill Mills
And thank you Hannes for all the guidance and being agreat collaborator on this!   And to the WG, chairs, and shepherds, we did somethinggood here.  Thank you all for the review,attention, time, and your help as well.   -bill On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 9:04 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: RFC 7628 on A Set of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms for OAuth

2015-09-01 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
+1 Am 1. September 2015 17:44:12 MESZ, schrieb Mike Jones : >Congratulations, Bill! > >-Original Message- >From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phil Hunt >Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 8:14 AM >To: Hannes Tschofenig >Cc: oauth@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd:

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: RFC 7628 on A Set of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms for OAuth

2015-09-01 Thread Mike Jones
Congratulations, Bill! -Original Message- From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phil Hunt Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 8:14 AM To: Hannes Tschofenig Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: RFC 7628 on A Set of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL)

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: RFC 7628 on A Set of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms for OAuth

2015-09-01 Thread Phil Hunt
+1 ! Phil > On Aug 31, 2015, at 23:24, Hannes Tschofenig > wrote: > > FYI: Thanks to Bill for the hard work! > > Forwarded Message > Subject: RFC 7628 on A Set of Simple Authentication and Security Layer > (SASL) Mechanisms for OAuth > Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 21:56:17 -0700 (

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Review Comments for draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-02

2015-09-01 Thread Nat Sakimura
Thanks very much! It looks good except that bit more text can be put into Privacy Consideration by looking at RFC6973, but it is not a blocking thing. Best, -- Nat Sakimura < n-sakim...@nri.co.jp> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. PLEASE READ: The

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Lifetime of refresh token

2015-09-01 Thread Nat Sakimura
Right. I wrote “pseudo-authentication” because it does not qualify as authentication. In another word, I am saying “DO NOT DO IT.” -- Nat Sakimura < n-sakim...@nri.co.jp> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. PLEASE READ: The information contained in this e-m

[OAUTH-WG] Fwd: RFC 7628 on A Set of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms for OAuth

2015-09-01 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
FYI: Thanks to Bill for the hard work! Forwarded Message Subject: RFC 7628 on A Set of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms for OAuth Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 21:56:17 -0700 (PDT) From: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org Reply-To: i...@ietf.org To: ietf-annou...@ietf.o