[OAUTH-WG] Protocol Action: 'SAML 2.0 Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-23.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'SAML 2.0 Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants' (draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-23.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group. The IESG contact persons a

[OAUTH-WG] Protocol Action: 'Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-18.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants' (draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-18.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group. The IESG contact persons

[OAUTH-WG] Protocol Action: 'JSON Web Token (JWT)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-32.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'JSON Web Token (JWT)' (draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-32.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Kathleen Moriarty and Stephen Farrell. A URL of this I

Re: [OAUTH-WG] session status change notification questions

Yep, my mistake. Apologies for the spam (including this apology email). -Brock From: John Bradley [mailto:ve7...@ve7jtb.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 8:21 AM To: Brock Allen Cc: OAuth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] session status change notification questions If you are talking

[OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration Management

Hi Justin, Hi all, I re-read the latest version of the dynamic client registration management document and I still have a few issues with the document. Let me start with the document structure. When you look at the ToC you will notice that there is something wrong. 2. Client Configuration E

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Status

I am willing to try and help you with it. John B. > On Jan 12, 2015, at 7:24 AM, Antonio Sanso wrote: > > hi *, > On Jan 9, 2015, at 11:18 AM, Hannes Tschofenig > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Happy New Year! >> >> I thought it would be good to quickly summarize where we are with our >> work i

Re: [OAUTH-WG] session status change notification questions

If you are talking about this spec http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-session-1_0.html , then the correct list for questions is the openid Connect one at http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab

[OAUTH-WG] session status change notification questions

A couple of questions about the session management spec related to the status change notifications (section 4): 1) Is there a working reference implementation of the JavaScript that goes with the current draft of the spec? 2) For the statement from section 4.2: “The OP iframe MUST enf

[OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration

Hi Justin, Hi all, as noted in my status update I am trying to finalize the pending items. Hence, I re-read the draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-21 document since my review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management raised some questions about the terminology. If you look at the structure of the ToC then yo

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Status

hi *, On Jan 9, 2015, at 11:18 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi all, > > Happy New Year! > > I thought it would be good to quickly summarize where we are with our > work in OAuth as we start into 2015. > > Late last year we issued a few working group last calls. > > * SPOP > https://datatra