> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Lemon [mailto:ted.le...@nominum.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 12:49 PM
> To: Mike Jones
> Cc: The IESG; oauth-cha...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-
> to...@tools.ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Ted Lemon's No Objection on draft-ie
Thanks for tracking all of this Stephen. Responses inline below...
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 2:43 PM
> To: Mike Jones; The IESG
> Cc: oauth-cha...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-
> to...@tool
While my personal preference is to not release PII as part of authentication,
We do have people demanding attributes in SAML and Connect at LoA 2+ for
identity resolution at the relying party.
https://www.idmanagement.gov/sites/default/files/documents/FICAM_TFS_ATOS.pdf
(see Appendix A)
JWT is
Hi Mike,
On 06/10/14 08:54, Mike Jones wrote:
> Thanks for your review, Stephen. I've added the working group to the
> thread so they're aware of your comments.
>
>> -Original Message- From: Stephen Farrell
>> [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014
>> 5:03 A
On Oct 6, 2014, at 3:54 AM, Mike Jones wrote:
> Sometimes authenticated encryption alone is good enough without requiring a
> signature. Different applications will have different requirements. So
> while this section discussion the applicable considerations, the working
> group felt that it
Thanks for your review, Radia. I've added the working group to the thread so
that they're aware of your comments.
> From: Radia Perlman [mailto:radiaperl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 4:46 PM
> To: sec...@ietf.org; The IESG; draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer@tools.ietf.org
> Su
Thanks for your review, Richard. My responses are inline below...
> -Original Message-
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard Barnes
> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 7:57 PM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: oauth-cha...@tools.ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org; draft-ietf-oauth-j
Thanks for your review, Meral. I've added the working group to this thread so
that they're aware of your comments.
> From: Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 12:40 AM
> To: draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer@tools.ietf.org; gen-...@ietf.o
Thanks for your review, Tom. I've added the working group to this thread so
they're aware of your comment.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Taylor [mailto:tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 8:33 PM
> To: ops-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer@tools
Thanks for your review, Ted. I'm adding the working group to the thread so
they're aware of your comments.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Lemon [mailto:ted.le...@nominum.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 6:58 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: oauth-cha...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-oauth-j
Thanks for your review, Stephen. I've added the working group to the thread so
they're aware of your comments.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie]
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 5:03 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: oauth-cha...@tools.ietf.org; draf
11 matches
Mail list logo