Good - thanks. I'll personally say that I believe this is ready for IETF LC
now.
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian
Campbell
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 1:04 PM
To: oauth
Subject: [O
Draft -04 of "An IETF URN Sub-Namespace for OAuth" has been published
and is available at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-04 - the
changes from the previous version are listed below.
Per http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09407.html
and barring any objecti
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : An IETF URN Sub-Namespace for OAuth
Author(s) : Brian Campbell
Hannes,
Thank you for the review and comments. My responses (which start with Z:) are
below.
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 3:08 AM
To: oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org)
Subject:
It was a design decision that seemed most appropriate given the
various factors and goals of my application at the time. My goal in
pointing to that was not to elicit feedback on the design itself but
to show that 'vendor-specific' extension grants will happen, and
already have happened, and that t
On 6/22/12 7:39 AM, Brian Campbell wrote:
> Unless there are objections from the WG, I'd like to publish -04 today
> with two smallish changes (new text listed below) to address the
> question raised yesterday in
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09381.html and
> have -04 be t
Unless there are objections from the WG, I'd like to publish -04 today
with two smallish changes (new text listed below) to address the
question raised yesterday in
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09381.html and
have -04 be the draft for LC.
First paragraph of §3:
"If a regi
I'll wait until the chairs tell me what you want
but I'm fine with doing the IETF LC on -03 now, or
with waiting if the chairs reckon that's better.
So just let me know.
Cheers,
S.
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listi
Hi all,
I just looked at the use case document and a few questions came to my mind:
* Who is the lead editor?
* The abstract and the introduction explain the history of why the document
exists. You may want to change that to an introduction that describes what use
cases are in the document a
