Re: [OAUTH-WG] unauthenticated token requests

2011-05-13 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
The client_id is required. client_secret is not. EHL On May 13, 2011, at 16:00, "Vlad Skvortsov" wrote: > Hi, > > a have a question regarding unauthenticated requests to a token endpoint > in OAuth 2.0. The spec v2-15 section 3 says[1] that "the authorization > server MAY allow unauthenticated

[OAUTH-WG] unauthenticated token requests

2011-05-13 Thread Vlad Skvortsov
Hi, a have a question regarding unauthenticated requests to a token endpoint in OAuth 2.0. The spec v2-15 section 3 says[1] that "the authorization server MAY allow unauthenticated access token requests when the client identity does not matter". Does that mean omitting "client_id" and "client_secr

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Formal security protocol analysis of OAuth 2.0

2011-05-13 Thread Doug Tangren
-Doug Tangren http://lessis.me On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Francisco Corella wrote: > We wrote a security analysis of double redirection protocols that has a > section on OAuth 2.0 as of draft 11. You can find it at > http://pomcor.com/techreports/DoubleRedirection.pdf > > Wow, this looks

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Formal security protocol analysis of OAuth 2.0

2011-05-13 Thread Francisco Corella
We wrote a security analysis of double redirection protocols that has a section on OAuth 2.0 as of draft 11.  You can find it at http://pomcor.com/techreports/DoubleRedirection.pdf Francisco --- On Fri, 5/13/11, Mark Mcgloin wrote: From: Mark Mcgloin Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Formal security proto

[OAUTH-WG] Formal security protocol analysis of OAuth 2.0

2011-05-13 Thread Mark Mcgloin
Does anyone know of a formal security protocol analysis that has been carried out for OAuth 2.0? I could only find analysis done against 1.0a, like this one: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5762765 thanks Mark ___ OAuth maili