Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split

2010-10-20 Thread Blaine Cook
On that process note, does anyone OBJECT to splitting the draft as described? The call closes in about an hour, depending on which time zone you're in. If we don't hear objections by mid-day PST tomorrow (the 21st), I think it's safe to say we have consensus on this issue. b. On 20 October 2010 2

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split

2010-10-20 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
This is not a comment about Mike's generous offer. Choosing an editor is the sole discretion of the chairs. While the working group can offer the chairs feedback, it is best done directly because of the personal nature of selecting people. At the end, the chairs choose the person they want for

[OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Perl client

2010-10-20 Thread Keith Grennan
Hello, Just wanted to let you know that there's an OAuth client library available for Perl. It's a pretty close port of the Ruby 'oauth2' gem, so far supporting just the web server profile, and the authorization code method of getting the access token. Works great with the 37signals and Facebook

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split

2010-10-20 Thread Marius Scurtescu
+1 On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Mike Jones wrote: > I am willing to serve as editor for the bearer token specification and have > my management's approval to do so.  Furthermore, I believe that I am > qualified, having successfully served as an editor for several standards > specificatio

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Informal Meeting @ IETF#79 (Beijing)

2010-10-20 Thread Igor Faynberg
Hannes, As it might be expected, I am interested in discussing OAuth security, and this is one reason I have been looking forward to meeting OAuthers--Torsten in particular. Whether this is going to be a formal or informal meeting is of no real importance to me (and actually I don't know th

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split

2010-10-20 Thread Brian Eaton
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Mike Jones wrote: > I am willing to serve as editor for the bearer token specification and have my > management's approval to do so.  Furthermore, I believe that I am qualified, > having successfully served as an editor for several standards specifications, > incl