+1
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> wrote: > I am willing to serve as editor for the bearer token specification and have > my management's approval to do so. Furthermore, I believe that I am > qualified, having successfully served as an editor for several standards > specifications, including the OASIS IMI specification and related SAML token > profiles, the OpenID PAPE specification, and (some time ago), the POSIX > Threads standard. > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Blaine Cook > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:32 PM > To: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split > > Over the past few weeks, the working group debated the issues around the > introduction of signatures and the structure of the specification. > The working group seems to endorse the proposal to split the current > specification into two parts: one including section 5 (bearer token) and the > other including the rest (how to obtain a token), with an additional > specification covering signature use cases. > > This serves as a call for consensus on the proposed editorial work. > Before we proceed with the changes, the chairs would like to ask if anyone > has any concerns or objections against this proposal. > > In addition, the chairs are seeking a volunteer to take over the bearer token > specification (section 5) as editor. > > Please submit your comments by Wednesday, October 20th. > > - The OAuth Working Group Chairs _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
