Don't forget this implementation:
http://leeloo.smartam.net/
Eve
On 12 Oct 2010, at 10:32 PM, David Recordon wrote:
> I haven't seen one. Have been trying to keep track of all the implementation
> on http://wiki.oauth.net/w/page/OAuth-2.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:33 AM, William
LinkedIn announced recently that they use OAuth2's UserAgent flow:
http://developer.linkedin.com/community/jsapi
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:32 PM, David Recordon wrote:
> I haven't seen one. Have been trying to keep track of all the
> implementation on http://wiki.oauth.net/w/page/OAuth-2.
>
>
>
Hey Hannes, I'd like to at least explain my reasoning behind not planning to
go to the China meeting because it really isn't restrictions around travel.
This is likely inpolitic to say, but it's because of how much of a waste of
my time the LA meeting was. The LA meeting contained numerous people w
Hi all,
please drop me a mail if you plan to travel to Beijing and if you are
interested to chat about OAuth. We have no time restrictions (unlike with
working group meetings) and so we could go into the details of any topic. I
personally would be interested to do some OAuth security work.
Ci
Hi Torsten,
We have to figure out what the most efficient way is to get our work
done.
With the Prague IETF we will see again whether there is a need for
face-to-face meeting. We had phone conference calls earlier this year as
well. That's another option to make progress in addition to the usage
What is the alternative from your point of view?
Regards,
Torsten.
--Originalnachricht--
Von: Eliot Lear
An:igor.faynb...@alcatel-lucent.com
Cc:Lodderstedt, Torsten
Cc:oauth@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth session at IETF-79
Gesendet: 15. Okt. 2010 13:10
I agree with Hannes' appro
Hi Torsten,
there is no problem with skipping a meeting. This is done in other working
groups as well.
Ciao
Hannes
On Oct 15, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>
> On 10/15/10 1:13 PM, tors...@lodderstedt.net wrote:
>> What is the alternative from your point of view?
>>
> Continued us
On 10/15/10 1:13 PM, tors...@lodderstedt.net wrote:
> What is the alternative from your point of view?
>
Continued use of the mailing list, as long as we think that's working.
Eliot
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/lis
I agree with Hannes' approach. What happened in Maastricht was that we
ended up with bifurcated discussions- in the room and on the list.
That didn't seem very productive.
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oau
I echo Torsten's concern.
I definitely plan to come, and Torsten's and Mark's security discussion
was one, perhaps the most important, of several that I planned to
participate in. and where I expect many others will.
Then there are new use cases, too, coming different place, and it would
be
10 matches
Mail list logo
