I echo Torsten's concern.
I definitely plan to come, and Torsten's and Mark's security discussion
was one, perhaps the most important, of several that I planned to
participate in. and where I expect many others will.
Then there are new use cases, too, coming different place, and it would
be good to settle on them and freeze the document at soon as possible so
that all new features in 2.0 could be introduced only if they are needed
by one or another use case.
The problem with the last meeting's "low energy" and respective
attendance, in my opinion, is one word: vacation. For many people the
meeting just came in the midst of it...
Igor
Torsten Lodderstedt wrote:
I'm surprised, since there is a lot to talk about. For example, I
planned to present (together with Mark) the current status of the
security consideration work (e.g. threat model). Moreover, there are
several I-Ds waiting for promotion to WG item. How will we proceed here?
Who else of the WG planned to come to IETF-79?
regards,
Torsten.
Am 14.10.2010 19:40, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig:
No, there is not going to be a session at IETF79. We intentionally
did not request a slot because of the IETF78 experience.
On Oct 14, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote:
Will there be a OAuth session at IETF-79? The agenda currently does
not contain such a session (http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/79/).
regards,
Torsten.
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
