On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 08:56:25AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
> getting ready to enable it, globally.
>
> Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
> a flexible structure where the size of the flexi
On 28/03/25 09:05, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 08:45:32AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
getting ready to enable it, globally.
Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
a flexibl
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
getting ready to enable it, globally.
Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
a flexible structure where the size of the flexible-array member
is known at compile-time, and refactor the rest of the code,
a
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 08:45:32AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
> getting ready to enable it, globally.
>
> Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
> a flexible structure where the size of the flexi
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
getting ready to enable it, globally.
Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
a flexible structure where the size of the flexible-array member
is known at compile-time, and refactor the rest of the code,
a
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
getting ready to enable it, globally.
Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
a flexible structure where the size of the flexible-array member
is known at compile-time, and refactor the rest of the code,
a
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 12:52:10PM +, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> Fix an oops in ttm_bo_delayed_delete which results from dererencing a
> dangling pointer:
>
> Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
> 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b7b: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 108
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 02:26:09PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:56 AM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 07:40:56PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> > > Okay, that sounds reasonable since I don't expect this to change very
> > > quickly.
> > >
> > > Since I do
(CC: Ben, John)
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 02:03:21PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:51 AM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 06:06:34PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 2:18 PM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 05
Hi Mel,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 05:36:14PM -0400, Mel Henning wrote:
> Userspace needs this information to set up zcull correctly.
This is a very brief motivation for the commit, please also describe what the
commit does using imperative form.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Henning
> ---
> .../drm/no
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 01:10:58PM +, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> Edit the comments on correct usage of drm_prime_gem_destroy to note
> that, if using TTM, drm_prime_gem_destroy must be called in the
> ttm_buffer_object.destroy hook, to avoid the dma_buf being freed leaving
> a dangling pointer w
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:01:54PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:58 AM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 07:00:57PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> > > This is a pointer in the gpu's virtual address space. It must be
> > > aligned according to ctxsw_align and
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 09:52:18AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
> getting ready to enable it, globally.
>
> Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
> a flexible structure where the size of the flexi
On 21/3/25 04:18, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
Hi Mel,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 05:36:14PM -0400, Mel Henning wrote:
Userspace needs this information to set up zcull correctly.
This is a very brief motivation for the commit, please also describe what the
commit does using imperative form.
Signed-
Am 28.03.25 um 12:01 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 01:10:58PM +, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
>> Edit the comments on correct usage of drm_prime_gem_destroy to note
>> that, if using TTM, drm_prime_gem_destroy must be called in the
>> ttm_buffer_object.destroy hook, to avoid th
15 matches
Mail list logo
