In article <20160413104528.ga24...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> I will go over how this feature works once again.
[Snip]
Thanks Vincent for the long and detailed explanation of how Netsurf uses
the cache.
After over 45 years working with computers I understand that the use of
an
In article <15a20671-a8e5-060e-bcfd-c85fb6d76...@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake wrote:
> On 23/08/16 09:22, Gerald Dodson wrote:
> > Further to my posting just now, Organizer has been affected or is also
> > involved. When I try to load it the error message "file does not start
> > with o
In article <9befc2b655.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk>,
John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> Has the NetSurf Wiki been abandoned?
> The link:
> http://wiki.netsurf-browser.org/Main_Page
> leads to an article "5 Ways to Make Money in Commodities".
I suspect not abandoned ... but spammed.
A user was
In article <55bc5e48e6li...@torrens.org.uk>,
Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> My SSD (250GB nominal) was running out - only about 6BG free.
> So I deleted !Cache's Netsurf directory. Now 157GB.
> Two questions:
> How does !Cache take account of NS choices? Disc cache is set to 1024MB.
> Wha
In article <20160909125304.gn3...@platypus.pepperfish.net>,
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:37:42PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> > But I have replaced !Cache.Caches.Default.Netsurf with a zip archive
> > called Netsurf. This appeasrs to work fine, currently it's 492K
After an informative thread on how the disc cache is used by Netsurf I
wrote:
On 13 Apr 2016 in article <55705bbd12nets...@avisoft.f9.co.uk>,
Martin Avison wrote:
> I have now deleted the whole cache, and reset Netsurf to the default
> values for disc of 1024MB and 28 days, and m
On 11 Nov in article <6c9e4e9956@abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> The last item delivered to me from this list was Dave Higton's, dated
> Nov07 at 20:56.
I have had 9 since then (excluding yours).
One on 7th, rest on 8th.
Martin
I know from previous posts that using the Netsurf v3.7 disc cache on my
Iyonix running RISC OS is probably not improving performance, depending
on how low my internet speed is. I am using it to gain experience in the
hope that newer, faster hardware will bring some performance benefits.
After run
On 15 Aug in article
<3c705f3f-e461-c7a7-3b70-54d63192a...@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake wrote:
> Could people please test build #4403 or later?
[Snip]
> We have just changed the way that HTTP authentication works,
[Snip]
> Please try entering the incorrect credentials, the correct
>
On 01 Sep in article
,
BW Chris France N4 wrote:
> I believe that Javascipt may be toggled on/off for use within
> RiscOS ... but where?
Choices -> Content.
In article <725eadd858.harr...@bazleyfamily.co.uk>,
Harriet Bazley wrote:
> I'm on RISC OS 5.27.
> Neither dragging the little yellow star nor dragging the URL text is
> currently working.
Saying 5.27 is no help - early versions had no relevant changes,
middle ones had some changes that may or
In article <590250e563m...@johnwoodhouse.plus.com>,
wrote:
> On trying to access https://padlet.com/ I get " Your browser is
> not supported. Some parts of this page may not work. Please upgrade
> your browser for a better experience. Upgrade Browser "
> I don't often see this message now. (
In article <5abb231a1b...@npost.uk>,
Chris Newman wrote:
> In article , DB wrote:
> > Perhaps the announcement by Michael Drake about a new toolchain
> > (https://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/1/topics/17766) is the
> > explanation.
> > Using Frank de Bruijn's latest version of Fetch_NS (2
In article <8e67b10b5b.harr...@bazleyfamily.co.uk>,
Harriet Bazley wrote:
> Since downloading v6511 of Netsurf I keep seeing "Unknown dynamic
> area" errors pop up in my Reporter window. These are 'silent'
> errors that don't generate a WIMP error box, so presumably the user
> is not supposed
14 matches
Mail list logo
