In article <5abb231a1b...@npost.uk>, Chris Newman <m...@npost.uk> wrote: > In article <f4091bbb5a.DBarrass@DB>, DB <d.barr...@zoho.eu> wrote:
> > Perhaps the announcement by Michael Drake about a new toolchain > > (https://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/1/topics/17766) is the > > explanation. > > Using Frank de Bruijn's latest version of Fetch_NS (2.50 > > 17-03-2023) allows the user to select those versions built with > > the new toolchain by setting "Set Fetch_NS$NewToolchain 1" > > (without the quotes) in the settings file. > The new toolchain version I downloaded has nothing on the icon bar > menu to distiguish it from the other flavour. > Using the link within the above topics link thus > https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/?C=M;O=D > I see the list of builds but as folk have noticed, the number order > is muddled. The numbers will be muddled, as with any list of files the file names are the sequence, and the number is a minor part of the filename. It seems that the naming convention before the number has changed. There even seem to be two 5433 files - https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/NetSurf-arm-riscos-gnueabi-gcc-5433.zip https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/NetSurf-arm-unknown-riscos-gcc-5433.zip I have no idea what the difference is! _______________________________________________ netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-le...@netsurf-browser.org
