On 16 Dec 2016 Chris Young wrote:
> On 16 December 2016 22:49:06 GMT+00:00, Richard Porter
> wrote:
>>Have you got a test page that tells you if javascript is on or off
>>e.g. Javascript is NOT enabled. ?
> http://www.javatester.org/javascript.html
> Chris
Useful page.
--
Richard Porter
On 16 Dec 2016 Richard Porter wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016 Chris Young wrote:
>> On 16 December 2016 22:49:06 GMT+00:00, Richard Porter
>> wrote:
>>>Have you got a test page that tells you if javascript is on or off
>>>e.g. Javascript is NOT enabled. ?
>> http://www.javatester.org/javascript.h
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016 Brian Jordan wrote:
> > I have JavaScript enabled here as a matter of course (Choices-->
> > Content--> Not ticked, which appears to be the default setting. The
> > calendar display is incomplete with the message "You may need to
> > disable Ja
In article <55ef946fbbbrian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan
wrote:
> In article , Peter Young
> wrote:
> > On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > > In article , Richard Porter
> > > wrote:
> > >> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > > http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
> > Not w
In article <4c8196ef55.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> >>> http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
> I've run into a slight problem with the calendar. If you click a link
> associated with an event the page opens in the window in the middle of
In article , Bryan Hogan
wrote:
[Snip]
> However having just turned my ARMini back on and tried again, I now
> get the version that says "Welcome NetSurf user, you have JS
> disabled". So something must have been wrong with the page caching.
Sounds likely.
> However, the calendar still doesn'
On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <4c8196ef55.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
>Richard Porter wrote:
>> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
>> I've run into a slight problem with the calendar. If you click a link
>> associated with an event the pa
On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> Hmm. There seem to be problems with both ARMini and ARMx6. What could
> they have in common which differs from other platforms?
I'm puzzled because I'm getting the same behaviour on both ARMX6 and
RiscPC, as I would expect using the same version of NetSurf. Does
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > In article <4c8196ef55.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
> > wrote:
> >> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
> >> I've run into a slight problem with the calendar. If you
In article <55efd852c1...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <55ef946fbbbrian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan
> wrote:
[Snip]
> Or perhaps you are being deliberately obtuse, I'm not sure.
If objectively reporting what I am seeing here with the latest release of
NetSurf constitut
In article <55efef95a0brian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan
wrote:
> In article <55efd852c1...@timil.com>, Tim Hill wrote:
> > In article <55ef946fbbbrian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan
> > wrote:
> [Snip]
> > Or perhaps you are being deliberately obtuse, I'm not sure.
> If objec
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > Hmm. There seem to be problems with both ARMini and ARMx6. What could
> > they have in common which differs from other platforms?
> I'm puzzled because I'm getting the same behaviour on both ARMX6 and
> RiscPC, as I would e
On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> As you have a problem with both machines ...
I didn't say that. I said that the behaviour was the same on both
machines i.e. the page was working as intended and not showing duff
gen on the ARMX6.
--
Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.pl
In article <96f819f055.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > As you have a problem with both machines ...
> I didn't say that. I said that the behaviour was the same on both
> machines i.e. the page was working as intended and not showing duff
>
On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <96f819f055.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
> wrote:
>> On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
>>> As you have a problem with both machines ...
>> I didn't say that. I said that the behaviour was the same on both
>> machines i.e. the page was wo
15 matches
Mail list logo