On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote: > In article <96f819f055.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter > <r...@minijem.plus.com> wrote: >> On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
>>> As you have a problem with both machines ... >> I didn't say that. I said that the behaviour was the same on both >> machines i.e. the page was working as intended and not showing duff >> gen on the ARMX6. > Not quite. > This was the post in question: >>>> Hmm. There seem to be problems with both ARMini and ARMx6. What >>>> could they have in common which differs from other platforms? >>> I'm puzzled because I'm getting the same behaviour on both ARMX6 and >>> RiscPC, as I would expect using the same version of NetSurf. Does it >>> contain any alternative paths depending on OS version or processor >>> type? > "the same behaviour" in reply to "there seem to be problems" I meant the same behaviour as each other, not the same _different_ behaviour. > Not confusing at all. > Good night. Good morning. -- Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/ Skype: minijem2 mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff that works.
