Re: Fail 2890 json

2015-08-14 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote: > Has any one else had this version fail? It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. If you encounter issues, turn JS off after loading yo

Re: Fail 2890 json

2015-08-14 Thread Peter Young
On 14 Aug 2015 Daniel Silverstone wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote: >> Has any one else had this version fail? > It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're > undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. I

Re: Fail 2890 json

2015-08-14 Thread David Pitt
Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote: > > Has any one else had this version fail? > > It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're > undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. If >

Re: Fail 2890 json

2015-08-14 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:31:36AM +0100, David Pitt wrote: > Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote: > > > Has any one else had this version fail? > > > > It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're > >

Re: Fail 2890 json

2015-08-14 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:31:36 +0100, David Pitt wrote: > Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote: > > > Has any one else had this version fail? > > > > It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're > > u

Re: Fail 2890 json

2015-08-14 Thread David Pitt
Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:31:36 +0100, David Pitt wrote: > > Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote: > > > > Has any one else had this version fail? > > > > > > It is distinctly likely t

Re: Fail 2890 json

2015-08-14 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:56:23 +0100, David Pitt wrote: > I should have been clearer, I meant JavaScript itself is working, sites that > crash on RISC OS didn't crash on Ubuntu. As Rob said -- RISC OS' UNIXLib is suffering a little right now. The JS engine uses setjmp()/longjmp() to do exceptio

Re: Fail 2890 json

2015-08-14 Thread Richard Torrens (lists)
In article <20150814072335.GB10674@somnambulist.local>, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > t is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're > undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. If > you encounter issues, turn JS off after loading your browser (n

Re: Fail 2890 json

2015-08-14 Thread David Pitt
"Gerald Dodson", on 13 Aug, wrote: > Has any one else had this version fail? Try #2911 or later. -- David Pitt