In article ,
Alan & Sally wrote:
> NetSurf 2.9 runs nicely on this set up but I have had no luck with any
> of the later development versions. I have just downloaded 3.0 Dev #833
> with the same result.
It seems that since NetSurf 2.9 DNS doesn't work when running on
VirtualRPC. It works on
In message <533d3d5a8bt...@netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake wrote:
> In article ,
>Alan & Sally wrote:
>> NetSurf 2.9 runs nicely on this set up but I have had no luck with any
>> of the later development versions. I have just downloaded 3.0 Dev #833
>> with the same result.
>
Michael Drake, on 16 Apr, wrote:
> In article ,
>Alan & Sally wrote:
>
> > NetSurf 2.9 runs nicely on this set up but I have had no luck with any
> > of the later development versions. I have just downloaded 3.0 Dev #833
> > with the same result.
>
> It seems that since NetSurf 2.9 DNS does
In article ,
David Pitt wrote:
> I can confirm that the current NetSurf 3.0 test builds do resolve on
> RPCEmu v0.8.9 on Mac OS X 10.8.3.
> The i686-darwin10 builds also resolve running natively on the Mac.
> (This conflict with VirtualRPC only applies to VRPC on the Mac, the
> NetSurf 3.0
In message <533d3d5a8bt...@netsurf-browser.org> Michael Drake wrote:
> In article ,
>Alan & Sally wrote:
>> NetSurf 2.9 runs nicely on this set up but I have had no luck with any
>> of the later development versions. I have just downloaded 3.0 Dev #833
>> with the same result.
> It seems th
