On 22 Nov 2012 Bryan Hogan wrote:
> In message <60245ff252.harr...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> Harriet Bazley wrote:
>> Is anyone else seeing this behaviour?
> Yes, most of my Hotlist has vanished too :-(
> Looking at the Hotlist file it is not corrupted, the html is
> perfectly formed, it
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:16:26AM +, Peter Young wrote:
> >> Is anyone else seeing this behaviour?
> > Yes, most of my Hotlist has vanished too :-(
> > Looking at the Hotlist file it is not corrupted, the html is
> > perfectly formed, it's just missing all but the first 35ish
> > entries.
> An
In article <20121122083649.GA3366@somnambulist.local>,
Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> If any of you had backups of your hotlist from before NetSurf seems to have
> lost entries, you could use copies of those backups to do the test. If the
> problem manifests repeatably, then copies of the offendi
Daniel Silverstone, on 22 Nov, wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:16:26AM +, Peter Young wrote:
> > > > Is anyone else seeing this behaviour?
> > > Yes, most of my Hotlist has vanished too :-( Looking at the Hotlist
> > > file it is not corrupted, the html is perfectly formed, it's just
> > >
On 22 Nov 2012, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
[snip]
> We did recently rewrite the hotlist code,
What was the first #number of this change?
Tony
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:43:24AM +, Tony Moore wrote:
> On 22 Nov 2012, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> [snip]
> > We did recently rewrite the hotlist code,
> What was the first #number of this change?
I do not recall. It was done not long after the hack weekend though, so you
should be able t
In article ,
Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> In article <20121122083649.GA3366@somnambulist.local>,
>Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > If any of you had backups of your hotlist from before NetSurf seems to
> > have lost entries, you could use copies of those backups to do the
> > test. If th
On 22 Nov 2012, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:43:24AM +, Tony Moore wrote:
> > On 22 Nov 2012, Daniel Silverstone
> > wrote:
> > > We did recently rewrite the hotlist code,
> > What was the first #number of this change?
>
> I do not recall. It was done not long afte
In article ,
David Pitt wrote:
> FWIW I note the Hotlist generated by #665 is missing the
> tag. OTOH I have not seen the Hotlist get truncated yet.
Having now checked on both Iyonix and ARMini, both hotlists are
truncated. Since I 'auto-upgrade' NetSurf very regularly (at least
daily), and
On 22 Nov 2012 Tony Moore wrote:
> On 22 Nov 2012, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:43:24AM +, Tony Moore wrote:
>>> On 22 Nov 2012, Daniel Silverstone
>>> wrote:
We did recently rewrite the hotlist code,
>>> What was the first #number of this change?
>>
>> I d
On 22 Nov 2012 Peter Young wrote:
[snip]
> Whereas with #665 and RISC OS 5.19 on an ARMini, while I did have the
> file truncated a while ago, it doesn't seem to be happening now. Not,
> at least, till the fairy dust that a friend is sure inhabits all
> computers sees this message :-)
That hap
With #665 on the Iyonix (5.19, 7 Nov 2012) the truncation is still
occurring when NetSurf is quit. The file I am using to test is
shortened from 24K to 10K.
--
Chris Johnson
On 22 Nov 2012, cj wrote:
> With #665 on the Iyonix (5.19, 7 Nov 2012) the truncation is still
> occurring when NetSurf is quit. The file I am using to test is
> shortened from 24K to 10K.
I've now checked #600 and #659 with RO5.19 (29-Oct-12), running on
RPCEmu v0.8.9. The results were identica
On 22 Nov 2012, Peter Young wrote:
[snip]
> I imported a 32K hotlist from the backup of the late Iyo, and ran
> NetSurf, and then quitted it. There was a bleep, and 32K suddenly
> became 8K. Is it something to do with the size of the hotlist perhaps?
No problem here, with a 90K Hotlist file.
T
On 22 Nov 2012, Tony Moore wrote:
> On 22 Nov 2012, cj wrote:
>
> > With #665 on the Iyonix (5.19, 7 Nov 2012) the truncation is still
> > occurring when NetSurf is quit. The file I am using to test is
> > shortened from 24K to 10K.
>
> I've now checked #600 and #659 with RO5.19 (29-Oct-12), runn
Using Netsurf 2.9 or #665 on an ARMini or Netsurf 2.9 on VRPC.
On this site http://www.riscoscode.com
Clicking menu on the top section, the shaded grey box, results in a serious
error and Netsurf terminates. A log is at:-
http://pittdj.co.uk/temp/rocode.zip
--
David Pitt
On 22 Nov 2012 Peter Young wrote:
> On 22 Nov 2012 Peter Young wrote:
> [snip]
>> Whereas with #665 and RISC OS 5.19 on an ARMini, while I did have the
>> file truncated a while ago, it doesn't seem to be happening now. Not,
>> at least, till the fairy dust that a friend is sure inhabits all
In article <20121122110116.GF3366@somnambulist.local>, Daniel Silverstone
wrote:
> > What was the first #number of this change?
> I do not recall. It was done not long after the hack weekend though, so
> you should be able to trace it.
Would it be possible to have once again something like the
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 05:59:21PM +0100, John Williams wrote:
> In article <20121122110116.GF3366@somnambulist.local>, Daniel Silverstone
> wrote:
>
> > > What was the first #number of this change?
>
> > I do not recall. It was done not long after the hack weekend though, so
> > you should be
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:22:27PM +, David Pitt wrote:
> Using Netsurf 2.9 or #665 on an ARMini or Netsurf 2.9 on VRPC.
>
> On this site http://www.riscoscode.com
>
> Clicking menu on the top section, the shaded grey box, results in a serious
> error and Netsurf terminates. A log is at:-
>
In article <20121122170227.gu3...@pepperfish.net>,
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> > Would it be possible to have once again something like the old builds
> > page detailing changes between test versions, or is that too much
> > unproductive work?
Sorry - Pluto breaks link! See Message-ID:
<201211221
On 22 Nov 2012 Peter Young wrote:
[snip]
> It gets even odder. I tried today to do something I've done many times
> before, so that I could search the global history. What I do is to
> open the global history from the icon bar icon, do menu over the
> history > History > Export, and drag the fi
On 22 Nov 2012, Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 05:59:21PM +0100, John Williams wrote:
[snip]
> > Would it be possible to have once again something like the old
> > builds page detailing changes between test versions, or is that too
> > much unproductive work?
>
> http://ci.netsurf
The following bytes were arranged on 22 Nov 2012 by Peter Young :
> I tried to add a comment to the bug report, and got a page saying
> "XSRF Attempt Detected!".
I suspect that's related to this one:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3586760&group_id=51719&atid=464312
NetSurf's SS
In article <60245ff252.harr...@blueyonder.co.uk>,
Harriet Bazley wrote:
> Recently I've been suffering increasingly frequent corruption of my
> NetSurf hotlist
The hotlist gets truncated when it fails to save one of the entries.
Since hotlist load/save was ported from libxml to libdom it has
On 22 Nov 2012 Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <60245ff252.harr...@blueyonder.co.uk>,
>Harriet Bazley wrote:
>> Recently I've been suffering increasingly frequent corruption of my
>> NetSurf hotlist
> The hotlist gets truncated when it fails to save one of the entries.
> Since hotlist
On 22 Nov 2012, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <60245ff252.harr...@blueyonder.co.uk>,
>Harriet Bazley wrote:
>
> > Recently I've been suffering increasingly frequent corruption of my
> > NetSurf hotlist
>
> The hotlist gets truncated when it fails to save one of the entries.
>
> Since hotl
27 matches
Mail list logo
