In message <502f57db9easg...@inspire.net.nz>
Keith Hopper wrote:
> In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
>Tim Hill wrote:
>> In article , Richard Porter
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
Keith Hopper wrote:
> In article ,
>Richard Porter wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I'm trying to imagine just how you would intonate 'emphasised' and
> > 'strong' so as to differentiate them. In fact I don't really know what
> > 'strong' means in this context.
>
> Neither do I, in general;
On 18 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
>Tim Hill wrote:
>> In article , Richard Porter
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reaso
On 18 Feb 2009 JJ van Poll wrote:
> In message <502f57db9easg...@inspire.net.nz>
> Keith Hopper wrote:
>> In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
>>Tim Hill wrote:
>>> In article , Richard Porter
>>> wrote:
On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> The element which should be
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:21:08 +
"David J. Ruck" wrote:
> The sort of modern natural voice synthesisers we are using in screen
> readers for the visiually impared, have all sorts of parameters which
> you can use to change the emphaisis. They actually read passages of
> text superbly well with,
On 18 Feb 2009 David J. Ruck wrote:
> The sort of modern natural voice synthesisers we are using in screen
> readers for the visiually impared, have all sorts of parameters which you
> can use to change the emphaisis. They actually read passages of text
> superbly well with, and honestly, sometime
In article <6553812f50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2009 David J. Ruck wrote:
> > The sort of modern natural voice synthesisers we are using in screen
> > readers for the visiually impared, have all sorts of parameters which
> > you can use to change the empha
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> A friend of mine makes use of the Dolphin stuff; the synthesiser that
> shipped with it was pretty dreadful.
We don't like to talk about that, it's utter sh*te, but we managed to ease
out the director responsible last year, and are rapidly elimating all trace
of it.
> Fort
On 18 Feb 2009 Michael Drake wrote:
> Let's stay on topic (NetSurf), please.
OK, what about Google maps?
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
Disclaimer: Please imagine about 50 lines of point
Richard Porter wrote:
OK, what about Google maps?
You mean some of the most complex javascript ever written and
specifically tailored for each major browers it runs on?
Would you like to guess which side of hell freezing over
it will work on Netsurf?
Cheers
---Dave
--
Email: dr...@druck.org
10 matches
Mail list logo
