Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 13 Jan 2009 "Torrens (lists)" wrote: > http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14177/css/14177_35.htm > has bad text overlap problems. Not here with RISC OS 5.13 and NetSurf r6029. Looks OK to me. > It's a pigs-ear of an html, using lots of text position information in > the css! I suspect if NS

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Barry E Allen
In article <501ce66c00li...@torrens.org.uk>, Torrens (lists) wrote: > http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14177/css/14177_35.htm > has bad text overlap problems. It's a pigs-ear of an html, using lots > of text position information in the css! I suspect if NS can work > that it can work miracles!

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Paul Vigay
In article <501ceafb6eba...@e-allen.me.uk>, Barry E Allen wrote: > I have similar problems with my TalkTalk bill which all comes out on one > line. > see:- > http://www.bparkfc.plus.com/allen/talktalkbill.html That looks like it's suffering from the same problem as a friend of mine's websit

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread David H Wild
In article <50a9e71c50.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, Dr Peter Young wrote: > > http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14177/css/14177_35.htm > > has bad text overlap problems. > Not here with RISC OS 5.13 and NetSurf r6029. Looks OK to me. Nor here with RO 6.14 and r6035. -- David Wild using RI

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Torrens (lists)
In article <50a9e71c50.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, Dr Peter Young wrote: > On 13 Jan 2009 "Torrens (lists)" wrote: > > http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14177/css/14177_35.htm > > has bad text overlap problems. > Not here with RISC OS 5.13 and NetSurf r6029. Looks OK to me. So there mu

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Torrens (lists)
In article <501ceafb6eba...@e-allen.me.uk>, Barry E Allen wrote: > In article <501ce66c00li...@torrens.org.uk>, Torrens (lists) > wrote: > > http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14177/css/14177_35.htm > > has bad text overlap problems. It's a pigs-ear of an html, using lots > > of text position

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread John Williams
In article <20090113095326.589eb...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>, Rob Kendrick wrote: > If this is the case, the solution is to make NetSurf render the tool's > output, not for you to complain at him about it. The tools in this case declare themselves as: Yahoo! SiteBuilder/2.6/1.6

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Paul Vigay
In article <501cf02066li...@torrens.org.uk>, Torrens (lists) wrote: > I looked around a bit. Plus.net's pages validate with very few errors. I > am in process of swapping to them - I have yet to find anything on > Plus.net that doesn't work properly with Netsurf! Support is via the www > site

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 13 Jan 2009 "Torrens (lists)" wrote: > In article <50a9e71c50.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, >Dr Peter Young wrote: >> On 13 Jan 2009 "Torrens (lists)" wrote: >>> http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14177/css/14177_35.htm >>> has bad text overlap problems. >> Not here with RISC OS 5.1

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Paul Vigay
In article <20090113095326.589eb...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>, Rob Kendrick wrote: > If people can deconstruct the HTML and make a minimal test case, that'll > help us towards that. Well, from a quick look at my friends page, removing the following couple of lines makes the top half of t

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:42:15 + (GMT) Paul Vigay wrote: > In article <501ceafb6eba...@e-allen.me.uk>, >Barry E Allen wrote: > > > I have similar problems with my TalkTalk bill which all comes out > > on one line. > > > see:- > > > http://www.bparkfc.plus.com/allen/talktalkbill.html >

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Torrens (lists)
In article <20090113095326.589eb...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>, Rob Kendrick wrote: > If this is the case, the solution is to make NetSurf render the tool's > output, not for you to complain at him about it. > If people can deconstruct the HTML and make a minimal test case, > that'll help

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Tim Hill
In article <20090113095326.589eb...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>, Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:42:15 + (GMT) Paul Vigay > wrote: > > In article <501ceafb6eba...@e-allen.me.uk>, Barry E Allen > > wrote: [Snip] > > > http://www.bparkfc.plus.com/allen/talktalkbill.html >

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Paul Vigay
In article <501cf6213eli...@torrens.org.uk>, Torrens (lists) wrote: > www.torrens.org.uk/NetSurf/0001.html > one minimal page that shows the problem. As it seems to be settings > dependant, the same directory holds a copy of my > !Boot.Choices.Users.Single.WWW.NetSurf.Choices and a screen shot

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Paul Vigay
In article <501cf68db3...@timil.com>, Tim Hill wrote: > Should (does) NS assume pixels, points or parsecs when no units are > present? Looking at various rogue sites (or rather sites which NetSurf won't render) it looks like the browser should assume that any values without a unit are pixels

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Jim Nagel
Torrens (lists) wrote on 13 Jan: > www.torrens.org.uk/NetSurf/0001.html > one minimal page that shows the problem. As it seems to be settings > dependant, the same directory holds a copy of my > !Boot.Choices.Users.Single.WWW.NetSurf.Choices > and a screen shot of the Netsurf window as it renders.

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:57:18 + (GMT) Tim Hill wrote: > Dare I say that I passed the phone bill though a CSS validator which > came up with many "You must put an unit after your number" (two for > each positioning element 'top' and 'left'in each page). But I know > I'll be told Validators are

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Torrens (lists)
In article <501cf901f1lists-nos...@vigay.com>, Paul Vigay wrote: > In article <501cf68db3...@timil.com>, >Tim Hill wrote: > > Should (does) NS assume pixels, points or parsecs when no units are > > present? > Looking at various rogue sites (or rather sites which NetSurf won't > render) i

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Torrens (lists)
In article <20090113114838.611e0...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>, Rob Kendrick wrote: > But I know > > I'll be told Validators are crap and a waste of time, irrelevant, and > > should all be expunged so I'll shut up soon. [Snip] > So yes, from > the point of view of web browser developmen

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Torrens (lists)
In article <26ccfa1c50@jim.nagel.ukonline.co.uk>, Jim Nagel wrote: > Torrens (lists) wrote on 13 Jan: > > www.torrens.org.uk/NetSurf/0001.html > > one minimal page that shows the problem. As it seems to be settings > > dependant, the same directory holds a copy of my > > !Boot.Choices.Users

Re: Text overlap

2009-01-13 Thread Michael Drake
In article <501cf6213eli...@torrens.org.uk>, Torrens (lists) wrote: > one minimal page that shows the problem. As it seems to be settings > dependant, the same directory holds a copy of my > !Boot.Choices.Users.Single.WWW.NetSurf.Choices > and a screen shot of the Netsurf window as it renders.

Default magnification

2009-01-13 Thread Torrens (lists)
As font sizes greater than the default don't work, how do I set 140% as the default Scale view for all pages? Do I detect another Choices config coming up? Or can a default magnification be added to Font sizes? -- Richard Torrens. http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild fo

Re: Default magnification

2009-01-13 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:29:31 + (GMT) "Torrens (lists)" wrote: > As font sizes greater than the default don't work, how do I set 140% > as the default Scale view for all pages? > > Do I detect another Choices config coming up? Or can a default > magnification be added to Font sizes? I seem t