On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:32:51PM +, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> There has been an issue with the bug system sending emails which has
> now been fixed.
Given the number of bounce emails I'm now getting, I see that quite a
few people have apparent difficulty typing their own email address
accurat
previously sent
notification to the list)
Apologies for any inconvenience caused.
I would like to take this opportunity to mention a few things:
- The bug tracker address is http://bugs.netsurf-browser.org/ and the
cover page there provides brief instructions on bug reporting.
- Issues can be
Rob Kendrick wrote on 13 Feb:
> ...back then the same issue happened ("occurs in revision" field not
> accepting an "r") and yet nobody complained!
My point was just a general one that software needs to anticipate that
different users might input stuff in ways that are obvious with
hindsight.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:24:19AM -0800, Dave Higton wrote:
>
> I think Netsurf is alone in RISC OS applications in having a version
> number incorporating a hash.
It's not a version number, it is a test build number. And it's odd that
nobody complained about test build numbers beginning with "
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:59:06 GMT Jim Nagel wrote:
> You'd think the software behind the bug-tracker could simply ignore
> the "#" if people type it in this box. It would seem natural enough
> for a user to type it, since "#" is shown loud&clear in the Net
On 13 Feb 2014 Jim Nagel wrote:
> You'd think the software behind the bug-tracker could simply ignore
> the "#" if people type it in this box. It would seem natural enough
> for a user to type it, since "#" is shown loud&clear in the Netsurf
> info box a
Brian Bailey wrote on 11 Feb:
> ... I'm not into guessology. # is not a British convention
> anyway so far as I am aware, for some 80ish years, it's a hindrance! Why
> put it there when it serves no useful purpose, I ask?
You'd think the software behind the bug-tracker
On 9 Feb 2014 Richard Porter wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2014 Vincent Sanders wrote:
>> If you have a bug like this please, please assist us by replying with
>> requested feedback or adding a note that simply says if the issue is
>> still reproducible. We are trying to get on top of the bugs for the
>>
On 9 Feb 2014 Vincent Sanders wrote:
> If you have a bug like this please, please assist us by replying with
> requested feedback or adding a note that simply says if the issue is
> still reproducible. We are trying to get on top of the bugs for the
> next release bug your assistance is appreciat
Can anyone who has an open bugs in our tracker [1] please go and review
your reports.
We have almost 200 outstanding bugs and it is very hard keeping on top
of them. An number of older bugs are awaiting feedback from the
reporter or no longer apply to current versions.
If you have a bug like
In article
,
Chris Young wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:29:14 + (GMT), Brian Jordan wrote:
[Snip my description of perceived problem]
> I'm not sure that is a bug, but more a feature request. It is easily
> reproduced by searching for something using Google, and then pressing
> back aft
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:29:14 + (GMT), Brian Jordan wrote:
> I carefully completed the form on the Mantis site and submitted it,
> Mantis responded with an page indicating that the information I had
> supplied about the CI build was incorrect and that I should use my
> browser's back button to
of typing it all again so I completed
the form and ensured the build information was correct and it was
successfully submitted.
I felt this apparent failing should be added to the bug tracker and, in
the interest of reporting the issue accurately, decided to recreate the
problem. I therefore wrot
In article <6199da0553.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, Peter Young
wrote:
[Snip]
> Thanks for reminding me. I still have 2.9 here; now, how do I remember
> to use it for reporting bugs?
Put a copy of 2.9 in a folder called "netsurf.reporting bugs".
What's a rhetorical question?
--
Tim Hill
..
On 29 Dec 2012 Martin Bazley wrote:
> The following bytes were arranged on 28 Dec 2012 by Peter Young :
>> The attempt to upload the report produced an obscure error message in
>> a NetSurf page, and I regret I forgot to record this.
> Luckily, you were not so neglectful the last time you made
The following bytes were arranged on 28 Dec 2012 by Peter Young :
> The attempt to upload the report produced an obscure error message in
> a NetSurf page, and I regret I forgot to record this.
Luckily, you were not so neglectful the last time you made exactly the
same complaint on this very list
I've just wasted quite a bit of time trying and failing to report a
bug using RISC OS NetSurf #749; yes, I did remember to disable
JavaScript! The attempt to upload the report produced an obscure error
message in a NetSurf page, and I regret I forgot to record this. The
report has duly been sen
On 5 Dec 2012 as I do recall,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 5 Dec 2012 Harriet Bazley wrote:
>
> > Is it just me, or is everyone who leaves bug reports getting a string of
> > spam notifications?
>
> I haven't noticed any.
>
Well, I've had two more on different bugs today. :-(
--
Harr
On 5 Dec 2012 Harriet Bazley wrote:
> Is it just me, or is everyone who leaves bug reports getting a string of
> spam notifications?
I haven't noticed any.
--
Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/
mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
I
On 25 Oct 2012 as I do recall,
Harriet Bazley wrote:
> Somebody seems to have worked out how to leave spam comments on bugs
> listed on Netsurf's Sourceforge bug tracker.
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3572535&group_id=51719&atid=46431
On 5 May 2012 Peter Young wrote:
> > I'm currently getting "500 - Internal Server Error".
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=464312&group_id=51719&func=browse
> working fine here.
> > Using r13571, RPC, RO6
> Same release, RISC OS 5.19, ARMini
e file correctly but I can't get the page
> to reload the missing image. I have tried setting the cache to 0.0 MB.
> I also tried Navigation > Reload this page ^F5 but to no avail. The
> page now displays correctly in other browsers.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=464312&g
I'm currently getting "500 - Internal Server Error".
I have a problem with reloading a web page. Owing to an upload problem
there was an image file with zero length, so of course it didn't
display. I then uploaded the file correctly but I can't get the page
to reload the missing image. I have
In article ,
Dr Peter Young wrote:
> The "Add new" point on the site is overlapped by "Bugs", and I haven't
> found a way of being able to click on it.
This is actually a problem with the page. Firefox does the same with
JavaScript disabled.
> Is there any direct URL for the "Add new" optio
On 1 Dec 2010 Richard Porter wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2010 Dr Peter Young wrote:
>> This is with RISC OS 5.16 and NetSurf r10951.
>> I've just had a crash on the HSBC site; I went to the bug reporting
>> site to report this, but have found it to be unusable. The "Add new"
>> point on the site is ove
On 1 Dec 2010 Dr Peter Young wrote:
> This is with RISC OS 5.16 and NetSurf r10951.
> I've just had a crash on the HSBC site; I went to the bug reporting
> site to report this, but have found it to be unusable. The "Add new"
> point on the site is overlapped by "Bugs", and I haven't found a way
This is with RISC OS 5.16 and NetSurf r10951.
I've just had a crash on the HSBC site; I went to the bug reporting
site to report this, but have found it to be unusable. The "Add new"
point on the site is overlapped by "Bugs", and I haven't found a way
of being able to click on it. Is there any
Is anyone else having this problem: when I go to the bug tracker there
doesn't seem to be any login link on the page although it does appear
in the page source? I need to go to /account/login.php to log in, and
then go back to the bugs page. If I click "Remember me" it doesn&#
On 9 Apr 2009, Richard Porter wrote:
> On 9 Apr 2009 Tony Moore wrote:
>
> > > How do you make it display more than 10 messages?
>
> > At the right, above and below the messages, a writable icon can be
> > set to 100 maximum but, since the site seems to have reverted to
> > session cookies, that n
On 9 Apr 2009 Tony Moore wrote:
>> How do you make it display more than 10 messages?
> At the right, above and below the messages, a writable icon can be set
> to 100 maximum but, since the site seems to have reverted to session
> cookies, that needs to be re-set at each visit. Reversion to sessi
On 9 Apr 2009, Richard Porter wrote:
> What's happened to the tracker? It's horrible!
It's not too bad in a 256-grey-scale screen mode!
> How do you make it display more than 10 messages?
At the right, above and below the messages, a writable icon can be set
to 100 maximu
In article ,
Richard Porter wrote:
> What's happened to the tracker? It's horrible!
Sourceforge changed it. It's outside our control (at least until we move
away from sourceforge).
> How do you make it display more than 10 messages?
I don't think you can wi
What's happened to the tracker? It's horrible! How do you make it
display more than 10 messages? Is it possible to use the old one?
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
Disclaim
On 25 Jul 2008 John-Mark Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Dr Peter Young wrote:
>> I've just submitted bug report 2027765 about a fatal crash on
>> www.traintimes.org.uk and have once again been unable to send the
>> logfile. This is 10K log when zipped, and appears to have
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Dr Peter Young wrote:
I've just submitted bug report 2027765 about a fatal crash on
www.traintimes.org.uk and have once again been unable to send the
logfile. This is 10K log when zipped, and appears to have been
truncated by the crash. On trying to submit it with the file,
I've just submitted bug report 2027765 about a fatal crash on
www.traintimes.org.uk and have once again been unable to send the
logfile. This is 10K log when zipped, and appears to have been
truncated by the crash. On trying to submit it with the file, I get
the error "failed creating formpost
Copy of text of bug report:
[quote]
RISC OS 5.13, NetSurf r4226, 30 May 04:15.
I've been using www.bbc.co.uk as my home page for some time without
any problem. Since I downloaded this build I have had a fatal crash on
start-up three times. www.bbc.co.uk/radio3 works fine.
I have a logfile zip
On 1 Feb 2008, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1 Feb 2008 Michael Drake wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I used to be permanently logged in to the tracker. Now I am
On 2 Feb 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
>> It's more like 300kB.
> Is that mentioned anywhere in the SourceForge documentation?
I haven't looked. That figure is learned by experience!
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_mailto:[
On 31 Jan 2008, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
>
> > I have just attempted to report a bug, and 134K zipped log file, to
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=51719&atid=464312
> > but it was r
hosen". But there was nowhere where I could
>> have chosen a group even if I knew what it meant! I do in fact get
>> logged in, but I have to go back and find the tracker page again.
> A work around is to adjust click on the login button to open it in a
> new window. Enter
ave chosen a group even if I knew what it meant! I do in fact get
> logged in, but I have to go back and find the tracker page again.
A work around is to adjust click on the login button to open it in a
new window. Enter your details, and when it gives the error close the
login window, and h
On 1 Feb 2008 Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I used to be permanently logged in to the tracker. Now I am told to
>> log in every time, and then when I log in I get the response "Error:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used to be permanently logged in to the tracker. Now I am told to
> log in every time, and then when I log in I get the response "Error:
> choose a group" instead of being sent
I used to be permanently logged in to the tracker. Now I am told to
log in every time, and then when I log in I get the response "Error:
choose a group" instead of being sent back to the tracker. What group?
Is this a problem with SourceForge or has something changed in NetSurf
On 31 Jan 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
> I have just attempted to report a bug, and 134K zipped log file, to
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=51719&atid=464312 but
> it was rejected with the error '500 - Internal Server Error'.
> I suspect that this ma
I have just attempted to report a bug, and 134K zipped log file, to
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=51719&atid=464312 but
it was rejected with the error '500 - Internal Server Error'.
I suspect that this may have been caused by the size of the attached
fil
You can never win on an issue like this but can I make a suggestion for a
couple of improvements to the built-in NetSurf 'welcome' pages?
There is a link to 'Contact the developers' which in turn points to the Bug
tracker, the Request tracker, the mailing list and other re
48 matches
Mail list logo
