On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:55:07 +0200, Ole wrote:
> Looks like it is not good to try about:blank. It still has network
> access involved:
>
> >(0.575378) content/fetchers/curl.c fetch_curl_setup 365: fetch
> >0x8cd9458, url 'http://www.google.com/favicon.ico'
>
> Please try about:config.
Unlike
Am Sonntag, den 26.08.2012, 11:05 +0200 schrieb Wendell P
:
Yea, it's still 6s with about:config. Why should fetching the favicon
take so long?
DNS, network layer setup, network latency...
At least it's clear that the first/single network access takes that
long.
Thanks for reporting it. I
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012, at 10:33 AM, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article
> <853f986283b9fd9996daf9e45b2364b5-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WWVhoA1RWMl5cRUMCX1pYQF8=-webmailer2@s,
>Ole wrote:
> > >(0.575378) content/fetchers/curl.c fetch_curl_setup 365: fetch
> > >0x8cd9458, url 'h
In article
<853f986283b9fd9996daf9e45b2364b5-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WWVhoA1RWMl5cRUMCX1pYQF8=-webmailer2@s,
Ole wrote:
> Looks like it is not good to try about:blank. It still has network
> access involved:
> >(0.575378) content/fetchers/curl.c fetch_curl_setup 365:
Am Sonntag, den 26.08.2012, 09:19 +0200 schrieb Wendell P
:
Tried it several times, still 6s. If it helps, while Firefox and
Chrome
are faster, w3m is also very slow on my machine.
Here is "netsurf -v about:blank 2>logfile"
Looks like it is not good to try about:blank. It still has networ
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012, at 03:48 AM, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article
> <1345913002.695.140661119461833.719c5...@webmail.messagingengine.com>,
> Looks like a 5 second wait for the fetch to start. Perhaps slow DNS.
>
> As Ole said, please try with a local page. You can use NetSurf's
> about:blank
In article
<1345913002.695.140661119461833.719c5...@webmail.messagingengine.com>,
Wendell P wrote:
> (1.119215) content/fetchers/curl.c fetch_curl_setup 365: fetch
> 0x9368948, url 'http://www.google.com/'
> (6.283815) content/content.c content__init 85: url
> file:///usr/share/netsurf/icons/d
Am Samstag, den 25.08.2012, 09:43 +0200 schrieb Wendell P
:
> On my machine, Chrome and Firefox each take 3s to boot, while
Netsurf
> takes 6s. Is this typical or do you think there is something
wrong?
Hello,
can you please test with an blank or at least simple *local* webpage?
I believe
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Chris Young wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:09:17 -0700, Wendell P wrote:
>
> > Netsurf 2.9 Debian distribution on Debian Wheezy.
> >
> > On my machine, Chrome and Firefox each take 3s to boot, while Netsurf
> > takes 6s. Is this typical or do you think there is
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:09:17 -0700, Wendell P wrote:
> Netsurf 2.9 Debian distribution on Debian Wheezy.
>
> On my machine, Chrome and Firefox each take 3s to boot, while Netsurf
> takes 6s. Is this typical or do you think there is something wrong?
Sounds a bit slow.
> Also, I sometimes get:
>
10 matches
Mail list logo