On 27/02/2019, David Pitt wrote:
> Walter Zambotti, on 27 Feb, wrote:
>
>> Downloaded and compiled latest build 3.8 which turned out to be 3.9 in
>> the
>> about.
>>
>> I have ensured that Enable JavaScript is ticked in the netsurf
>> preferences
>> content tab.
>>
>> But when I visit any java sit
Walter Zambotti, on 27 Feb, wrote:
> Downloaded and compiled latest build 3.8 which turned out to be 3.9 in the
> about.
>
> I have ensured that Enable JavaScript is ticked in the netsurf preferences
> content tab.
>
> But when I visit any java site including :
>
> www.whatismybrowser.com/detec
On 27/02/2019, Walter Zambotti wrote:
> Downloaded and compiled latest build 3.8 which turned out to be 3.9 in the
> about.
>
> I have ensured that Enable JavaScript is ticked in the netsurf preferences
> content tab.
>
> But when I visit any java site including :
>
Just out of interest, whilst t
On 27 Feb 2019 Walter Zambotti wrote:
> Downloaded and compiled latest build 3.8 which turned out to be 3.9 in the
> about.
> I have ensured that Enable JavaScript is ticked in the netsurf preferences
> content tab.
> But when I visit any java site including :
> www.whatismybrowser.com/detect
On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <96f819f055.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
> wrote:
>> On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
>>> As you have a problem with both machines ...
>> I didn't say that. I said that the behaviour was the same on both
>> machines i.e. the page was wo
On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> As you have a problem with both machines ...
I didn't say that. I said that the behaviour was the same on both
machines i.e. the page was working as intended and not showing duff
gen on the ARMX6.
--
Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.pl
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > Hmm. There seem to be problems with both ARMini and ARMx6. What could
> > they have in common which differs from other platforms?
> I'm puzzled because I'm getting the same behaviour on both ARMX6 and
> RiscPC, as I would e
In article <55efef95a0brian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan
wrote:
> In article <55efd852c1...@timil.com>, Tim Hill wrote:
> > In article <55ef946fbbbrian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan
> > wrote:
> [Snip]
> > Or perhaps you are being deliberately obtuse, I'm not sure.
> If objec
In article <55efd852c1...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <55ef946fbbbrian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan
> wrote:
[Snip]
> Or perhaps you are being deliberately obtuse, I'm not sure.
If objectively reporting what I am seeing here with the latest release of
NetSurf constitut
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > In article <4c8196ef55.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
> > wrote:
> >> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
> >> I've run into a slight problem with the calendar. If you
On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> Hmm. There seem to be problems with both ARMini and ARMx6. What could
> they have in common which differs from other platforms?
I'm puzzled because I'm getting the same behaviour on both ARMX6 and
RiscPC, as I would expect using the same version of NetSurf. Does
On 17 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <4c8196ef55.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
>Richard Porter wrote:
>> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
>> I've run into a slight problem with the calendar. If you click a link
>> associated with an event the pa
In article , Bryan Hogan
wrote:
[Snip]
> However having just turned my ARMini back on and tried again, I now
> get the version that says "Welcome NetSurf user, you have JS
> disabled". So something must have been wrong with the page caching.
Sounds likely.
> However, the calendar still doesn'
In article <4c8196ef55.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> >>> http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
> I've run into a slight problem with the calendar. If you click a link
> associated with an event the page opens in the window in the middle of
In article <55ef946fbbbrian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan
wrote:
> In article , Peter Young
> wrote:
> > On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > > In article , Richard Porter
> > > wrote:
> > >> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > > http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
> > Not w
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016 Brian Jordan wrote:
> > I have JavaScript enabled here as a matter of course (Choices-->
> > Content--> Not ticked, which appears to be the default setting. The
> > calendar display is incomplete with the message "You may need to
> > disable Ja
On 16 Dec 2016 Richard Porter wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016 Chris Young wrote:
>> On 16 December 2016 22:49:06 GMT+00:00, Richard Porter
>> wrote:
>>>Have you got a test page that tells you if javascript is on or off
>>>e.g. Javascript is NOT enabled. ?
>> http://www.javatester.org/javascript.h
On 16 Dec 2016 Chris Young wrote:
> On 16 December 2016 22:49:06 GMT+00:00, Richard Porter
> wrote:
>>Have you got a test page that tells you if javascript is on or off
>>e.g. Javascript is NOT enabled. ?
> http://www.javatester.org/javascript.html
> Chris
Useful page.
--
Richard Porter
In message <55ef509b5e...@timil.com>
Tim Hill wrote:
>>From Newsgroup: comp.sys.acorn.misc
> Subject: Re: London Show news
> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:20
> In article , Peter Young
> wrote:
>> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
>>> In article <4ec82cef55.br...@helpful.demon.co.uk>, Bry
On 16 December 2016 22:49:06 GMT+00:00, Richard Porter
wrote:
>Have you got a test page that tells you if javascript is on or off
>e.g. Javascript is NOT enabled. ?
http://www.javatester.org/javascript.html
Chris
On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
>>> http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
I've run into a slight problem with the calendar. If you click a link
associated with an event the page opens in the window in the middle of
your page. There doesn't appear to be any way to get back to the
calendar short of
On 16 Dec 2016 Brian Jordan wrote:
> I have JavaScript enabled here as a matter of course (Choices-->
> Content--> Not ticked, which appears to be the default setting. The
> calendar display is incomplete with the message "You may need to disable
> Javascript and reload this page" If I then disab
On 16 Dec 2016 Peter Young wrote:
[ http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/ ]
#3798 works as expected.
>>> Works on #3803 here (6.20 RPC)
>> Thanks. I'll assume 'user error'.
> How? I can only report what I see! I call up the site, it tells me
> that JavaScript is on, I turn it off, and the si
In article ,
Peter Young wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > In article , Richard Porter
> > wrote:
> >> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> > http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
> Not working here, #3803. The site says that JavaScript is on, even
> though I've turned it
On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> In article , Richard Porter
> wrote:
>> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
Not working here, #3803. The site says that JavaScript is on, even
though I've turned it off, quit NetSurf and tried to see the site
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
> >>> http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
> >> Not working here, #3803. The site says that JavaScript is on, even
> >> though I've turned it off, quit NetSurf and tried to see the site
> >> again.
> > Must be a problem with that
On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote:
>>> http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/
>> Not working here, #3803. The site says that JavaScript is on, even
>> though I've turned it off, quit NetSurf and tried to see the site
>> again.
> Must be a problem with that version. The message saying it is ON is
> rende
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 00:41:08 +0100, Ole Loots wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 19.02.2016, 20:11 + schrieb Peter Slegg:
>
> > I am looking at a survey form and wondered if buttons should work ?
>
>
> When I testet JS builds for Atari three weeks ago, onclick for buttons
> worked well.
It's interes
> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:57:38 + (GMT)
> From: Peter Slegg
> Subject: Javascript in Atari build
>
> I am using Atari build 3420 and JS seems to be disabled. Paypal
> said it was disabled so I tried setting changing the settings
> because I couldn't remember which is on and off and it can't
>Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 00:41:08 +0100
>From: Ole Loots
>Subject: Re: Javascript features list
>Am Freitag, den 19.02.2016, 20:11 + schrieb Peter Slegg:
>
>> I am looking at a survey form and wondered if buttons should work ?
>
>
>When I tested JS builds for Atar
Am Freitag, den 19.02.2016, 20:11 + schrieb Peter Slegg:
> I am looking at a survey form and wondered if buttons should work ?
When I testet JS builds for Atari three weeks ago, onclick for buttons
worked well. What does the verbose log say? And what do you expect?
The code inside the oncl
On 19/02/16 20:11, Peter Slegg wrote:
Is there a maintained list of available JS features ?
The closest is this:
http://git.netsurf-browser.org/netsurf.git/tree/Docs/UnimplementedJavascript.txt
--
Michael Drake http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
In article ,
Richard Porter wrote:
> > document.write("javascript is enabled");
> alternatively / additionally:
> JS Off
Excellent!
I drop out of PHP and do them both, then drop back in:
?>
document.write("JavaScript is
enabled!
");
JavaScript is disabled
On 17 Feb 2016 John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
>> I suspect that what I require is very simple/trivial and can be done in one
>> line of JS.
> try this:
> document.write("javascript is enabled");
alternatively / additionally:
JS Off
--
Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.
In article <60ac4d5355.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk>,
John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> try this:
> document.write("javascript is enabled");
Perfick, as HE Bates was prone to write!
Thank you.
John
--
| John Williams
| joh...@ukgateway.net
Names for Soul Band:- Soul Supplier
John Williams wrote
> Can anyone who understands JS provide a snippet of JS code that I can
> insert in the footer of my local HTML index page to conditionally print,
> say, "JavaScript is enabled!" as a reminder of NetSurf's current JS status.
> If anyone wants to "go the whole hog" and reflec
ements :-)
Greets,
Ole
Am Montag, den 25.01.2016, 21:12 + schrieb Peter Slegg:
> >Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 09:53:46 +
> >From: Michael Drake
> >Subject: Re: JavaScript enabled builds for Atari
> >To: netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 09:53:46 +
>From: Michael Drake
>Subject: Re: JavaScript enabled builds for Atari
>To: netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
>
>
>
>On 23/01/16 23:06, Peter Slegg wrote:
>
>> Using Netsurf JS today it has crashed a few times.
>>
On 23/01/16 23:06, Peter Slegg wrote:
Using Netsurf JS today it has crashed a few times.
It isn't as stable as the last non-JS versions.
How about when you use it with "enable_javascript:0"?
--
Michael Drake http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:00:14 , Peter Slegg wrote:
>
> I spotted this in the git commits last night. I tried the build but
> I don't think the setting is exposed in the Atari Choices dialogue.
>
> I just tried build 3296 but I wasn't sure whether 0 or 1 was on.
> After a couple of failed attempts,
On Saturday 23 January 2016 13:00:14 Peter Slegg wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 11:22:09 +
> > From: Michael Drake
> > Subject: JavaScript enabled builds for Atari
> > We have enabled JavaScript builds (json) for Atari on the CI server.
> > I'd be interested to get confirmation on whether
> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 11:22:09 +
> From: Michael Drake
> Subject: JavaScript enabled builds for Atari
>
>
> We have enabled JavaScript builds (json) for Atari on the CI server.
>
> You can get them here:
>
> http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/atari/?C=M;O=D
>
> I'm not sure if the At
Dave Higton, on 5 Jan, wrote:
[snip]
> Any other testers in other time zones willing to give it a go?
I moved myself to Cupertino CA temporarily, UTC-8.00 Pacific, mostly because
I already have a clock for that in the iMac's notification area. (I missed
the first hour of an Apple presentation o
In message
David Pitt wrote:
>Dave Higton, on 3 Jan, wrote:
>
>> At some stage recently the Javascript Date() function appears to have
>> been fixed. Previously, when DST was in force, the time was shown as
>> 1 hour in advance (double correction).
>>
>> The attached is a short file
In article <9da78e3c55.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, Peter Young
wrote:
> On 3 Jan 2016 Dave Higton wrote:
> > In message <7b97583c55.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> Peter Young
> >wrote:
> >>On 3 Jan 2016 Dave Higton wrote:
> >>
> >>> At some stage recently the Javascript Date()
On 3 Jan 2016 Dave Higton wrote:
> In message <7b97583c55.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
> Peter Young wrote:
>>On 3 Jan 2016 Dave Higton wrote:
>>
>>> At some stage recently the Javascript Date() function appears to have
>>> been fixed. Previously, when DST was in force, the time
Dave Higton, on 3 Jan, wrote:
> At some stage recently the Javascript Date() function appears to have
> been fixed. Previously, when DST was in force, the time was shown as
> 1 hour in advance (double correction).
>
> The attached is a short file to test it, and I would appreciate your
> feedbac
In article <7b97583c55.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>,
Peter Young wrote:
> On 3 Jan 2016 Dave Higton wrote:
> > At some stage recently the Javascript Date() function appears to have
> > been fixed. Previously, when DST was in force, the time was shown as
> > 1 hour in advance (double correc
In message <7b97583c55.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
Peter Young wrote:
>On 3 Jan 2016 Dave Higton wrote:
>
>> At some stage recently the Javascript Date() function appears to have
>> been fixed. Previously, when DST was in force, the time was shown as
>> 1 hour in advance (double co
On 3 Jan 2016 Dave Higton wrote:
> At some stage recently the Javascript Date() function appears to have
> been fixed. Previously, when DST was in force, the time was shown as
> 1 hour in advance (double correction).
> The attached is a short file to test it, and I would appreciate your
> feed
In message
on 30 Mar 2015 David Feugey wrote:
> ... but nothing about JavaScript support. Just "work in progress".
I take you point about lack of detail, but I'm only a user rather than
a developer, so am not in a position to know what has been done but
hasn't been listed on the support web pa
Cool, exactly what I need :) Thanks John!
Hope to get/find more examples... I don't have complex needs, so
NetSurf could be OK for this.
Bye, David
2015-03-29 21:57 GMT+02:00 John Rickman Iyonix :
> David Feugey wrote
>
>> Hi. I worked on several appliances since 2000, and I'm now switching back
... but nothing about JavaScript support. Just "work in progress".
2015-03-29 17:54 GMT+02:00 Andrew Pinder :
> In message mail.com>
> on 29 Mar 2015 David Feugey wrote:
>
>> Hi. I worked on several appliances since 2000, and I'm now switching back
>> to RISC OS. As I have total control on the
David Feugey wrote
> Hi. I worked on several appliances since 2000, and I'm now switching back
> to RISC OS. As I have total control on the applications, I would like to
> try to provide client appliances for these applications.
> I know that NetSurf has only a limited support of JavaScript. But
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 05:53:19PM +0200, David Feugey wrote:
> Sorry. The mailing list seems not to like messages from Gmail. Let's try
> again.
It seemed to arrive just fine...
B.
In message
on 29 Mar 2015 David Feugey wrote:
> Hi. I worked on several appliances since 2000, and I'm now switching back
> to RISC OS. As I have total control on the applications, I would like to
> try to provide client appliances for these applications.
> I know that NetSurf has only a limit
Sorry. The mailing list seems not to like messages from Gmail. Let's try again.
I worked on several appliances since 2000, and I'm now switching back
to RISC OS. As I have total control on the applications, I would like
to try to provide client appliances for these applications.
I know that NetSu
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:22:48PM +, Peter Slegg wrote:
> >> I guess this would be relevant only for the "json" version of Netsurf
> >> (or would simply do nothing in the "jsoff" version).
> >
> >There is no jsoff version anymore.
> >
> >B.
>
> There isn't a Javascript version for the Atari b
In article <9c2713ff52.wra...@wra1th.plus.com>,
Gavin Wraith wrote:
> bold /mu problem. Can I take it that this has to be a fault with the
> fonts Corpus, Homerton and Trinity in Resources:$.Fonts somewhere? I must
> say, I did not know that these had been extended to unicode. Pity about
> the
In message <44d50eff52.wra...@wra1th.plus.com> you wrote:
> In message <550806ff52.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> you wrote:
>
> > > What font are you using?
>
> Experimentation has indicated that it is the Exo font on the Rpi
> which is causing overheavy /Delta and /pi glyphs. My only
> problem
In message <550806ff52.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> you wrote:
> > What font are you using?
Experimentation has indicated that it is the Exo font on the Rpi
which is causing overheavy /Delta and /pi glyphs. My only
problem now is getting rid of the overheavy /mu. Apart from that
Greek text is re
On 16 Dec 2012 John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> Peter Young wrote
>>> Looks more complete on linux raspberry Pi Chromium Chromium browser.
>>> On RISC OS the accented characters appear as hex couplets.
>> It's all Greek here (and Greek to me!) on an ARMini, RISC OS 5.19.
>> Perhaps you don't have
In message you wrote:
> Peter Young wrote
>
> >> Looks more complete on linux raspberry Pi Chromium Chromium browser.
> >> On RISC OS the accented characters appear as hex couplets.
>
> > It's all Greek here (and Greek to me!) on an ARMini, RISC OS 5.19.
> > Perhaps you don't have the necessar
Peter Young wrote
>> Looks more complete on linux raspberry Pi Chromium Chromium browser.
>> On RISC OS the accented characters appear as hex couplets.
> It's all Greek here (and Greek to me!) on an ARMini, RISC OS 5.19.
> Perhaps you don't have the necessary font?
Probably:-( I have DoulosSIL
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 11:11:57 GMT, Gavin Wraith wrote:
> So how
> do I flush the RUfl cache, and get it to start over when I am trying out
> a new set of fonts?
*delete .scrapdirs.scrapdir.RUfl_cache
(that's possibly out-of-date, but I don't think it has changed)
Chris
In message <45cce0fe52.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> you wrote:
> Perhaps you don't have the necessary font?
OK. Nowt to do with JavaScript, but probably RUfl. Am I right in
thinking that when the browser starts up the RUfl thingy makes
a database that tells the browser which font to look for a s
On 15 Dec 2012 John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> Harriet Bazley wrote
>> On 15 Dec 2012 as I do recall,
>> Gavin Wraith wrote:
>>> Using NetSurf 3 #739. Wonderful to have some Javascript working,
>>> enough at least to show Greek text in http://memiyawanzi.wordpress.com/ .
>> That's no
Harriet Bazley wrote
> On 15 Dec 2012 as I do recall,
> Gavin Wraith wrote:
>> Using NetSurf 3 #739. Wonderful to have some Javascript working,
>> enough at least to show Greek text in http://memiyawanzi.wordpress.com/ .
> That's not Javascript... that's just Unicode :-)
> Seeing the
On 15 Dec 2012 as I do recall,
Gavin Wraith wrote:
> Using NetSurf 3 #739. Wonderful to have some Javascript working,
> enough at least to show Greek text in http://memiyawanzi.wordpress.com/ .
That's not Javascript... that's just Unicode :-)
Seeing the same thing here in RISC OS 5 wi
69 matches
Mail list logo
