In article <530f63fff3t...@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake wrote:
> about:testament should say if CI builds are built with JS.
- which conveniently works as a URL file to put on the pinboard if required.
John
In article <8a185b0f53.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>,
Peter Young wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2013 Steve Fryatt wrote:
> > Don't the infobox strings differ? I've not got RISC OS in front of me
> > at present, so I can't check.
> No, they don't.
about:testament should say if CI builds are built with
On 16 Jan 2013 Steve Fryatt wrote:
> On 14 Jan, Harriet Bazley wrote in message
> :
[snip]
>> Otherwise I'm not aware of any other mechanism for discerning which of the
>> versions you have (other than a much larger !RunImage on disc!)
> Don't the infobox strings differ? I've not got RISC
On 14 Jan, Harriet Bazley wrote in message
:
> Iconbar menu: Choices->Content Disable JavaScript on/off.
>
> I'm assuming that the -jsoff versions don't have this extra option icon at
> all, since the -json versions seem to have the Disable option set by
> default. (Probably wisest as it ma
On 15 Jan 2013, Tim Hill wrote:
> In article , Tony
> Moore wrote:
> > On 14 Jan 2013, Tim Hill wrote:
> > > In article <89e6ff0d53.c.n@virgin.net>, ChrisF
> > > wrote:
> > > > In message <2f9bf20d53@nails.abbeypress.net> Jim Nagel
> > > >wrote:
>
> > [snip]
>
> > > > > A we
In article , Tony Moore
wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2013, Tim Hill wrote:
> > In article <89e6ff0d53.c.n@virgin.net>, ChrisF
> > wrote:
> > > In message <2f9bf20d53@nails.abbeypress.net> Jim Nagel
> > >wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > A wee handy-feature suggestion (if it's not a lot of prog
Peter Young wrote
> On 14 Jan 2013 John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
>> Jim Nagel wrote
>>> Using build 797 at the moment, on both RiscPC 4.39 and Iyonix 5.18.
>> did you mean #787?
> Why? I'm currently on #809, downloaded this morning by the invaluable
> Fetch_NS.
My mistake I downloaded #812 b
On 14 Jan 2013, Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <89e6ff0d53.c.n@virgin.net>, ChrisF
> wrote:
> > In message <2f9bf20d53@nails.abbeypress.net> Jim Nagel
> >wrote:
[snip]
> > > A wee handy-feature suggestion (if it's not a lot of programming
> > > effort): A "Javascript on/off bu
In article <89e6ff0d53.c.n@virgin.net>, ChrisF
wrote:
> In message <2f9bf20d53@nails.abbeypress.net> Jim Nagel
>wrote:
> > Chris Newman wrote on 14 Jan:
> >> I get the test versions using !Fetch_NS. I'm now up to 809.
> >> JavaScript option now duly found.
> > A wee handy-fe
On 14 Jan 2013 John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> Jim Nagel wrote
>> Using build 797 at the moment, on both RiscPC 4.39 and Iyonix 5.18.
> did you mean #787?
Why? I'm currently on #809, downloaded this morning by the invaluable
Fetch_NS.
With best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Ta) and fa
In message <2f9bf20d53@nails.abbeypress.net>
Jim Nagel wrote:
> Chris Newman wrote on 14 Jan:
>> I get the test versions using !Fetch_NS. I'm now up to 809.
>> JavaScript option now duly found.
> A wee handy-feature suggestion (if it's not a lot of programming
> effort):
> A "Java
Jim Nagel wrote
> Using build 797 at the moment, on both RiscPC 4.39 and Iyonix 5.18.
did you mean #787?
--
John Rickman - http://mug.riscos.org/
You are not the same people who left that station Or who will arrive
at any terminus
Chris Newman wrote on 14 Jan:
> I get the test versions using !Fetch_NS. I'm now up to 809.
> JavaScript option now duly found.
A wee handy-feature suggestion (if it's not a lot of programming
effort):
A "Javascript on/off button" on the toolbar.
Basically a handy shortcut to the iconbar "Choic
In article <20130114130007.gd15...@pepperfish.net>,
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:44:37PM +, Chris Newman wrote:
> > Er! I must be a luddite. I don't understand the term -jsoff. However, my
> > version had the option so I must have the non -jsoff version; whatever that
>
In article <444ae90d53.c.n@virgin.net>, ChrisF wrote:
> In message <530de884c2cvj...@waitrose.com> Chris Newman
>wrote:
> > In article , Harriet Bazley
> > wrote:
> >> On 14 Jan 2013 as I do recall, Chris Newman wrote:
> >> I'm assuming that the -jsoff versions don't have th
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:44:37PM +, Chris Newman wrote:
> Er! I must be a luddite. I don't understand the term -jsoff. However, my
> version had the option so I must have the non -jsoff version; whatever that
> means.
There are two builds of each version; -json (JavaScript on) and -jsoff
(Ja
In message <530de884c2cvj...@waitrose.com>
Chris Newman wrote:
> In article ,
>Harriet Bazley wrote:
>> On 14 Jan 2013 as I do recall,
>> Chris Newman wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sojourning temporarily in Australia, I've not kept au fait with all the
>>> latest postings so c
In article ,
Harriet Bazley wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2013 as I do recall,
> Chris Newman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sojourning temporarily in Australia, I've not kept au fait with all the
> > latest postings so could somebody please remind me how to enable/disable
> > JavaScript.
> >
> Iconb
On 14 Jan 2013 as I do recall,
Chris Newman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sojourning temporarily in Australia, I've not kept au fait with all the
> latest postings so could somebody please remind me how to enable/disable
> JavaScript.
>
Iconbar menu: Choices->Content
Disable JavaScript on/off.
I'm
19 matches
Mail list logo
