On 13 May 2008 Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13 May 2008 David J. Ruck wrote:
>> Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 13 May 2008 Kevin Wells wrote:
>>>
Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has
a spell checker.
>>>
Not sure
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Richard Porter wrote:
On 13 May 2008 John-Mark Bell wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Paul Vigay wrote:
The only (occasional) way around this is to adjust click on the submit
button to submit into a new window, but sometimes this doesn't work.
There shouldn't be any differ
On 13 May 2008 John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008, Paul Vigay wrote:
>> I know what would be good
>>
>> When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into
>> forms. ...
> Increase the memory cache size to enhance the chances of clicking back
> retaining the form d
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Paul Vigay wrote:
I know what would be good
When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into
forms. There are numerous times when I complete a lengthy form and click
submit, only to find that I've mistyped the captcha or some other error has
occurre
On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill wrote:
Btw, it's "a criterion" - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and
semantic errors.
>>> I hope one day someone will come
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill wrote:
> >> Btw, it's "a criterion" - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and
> >> semantic errors.
> > I hope one day someone will come along with a pedantry checker. ;-)
> I knew someone woul
On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill wrote:
>> Btw, it's "a criterion" - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and
>> semantic errors.
> I hope one day someone will come along with a pedantry checker. ;-)
I knew someone would say that!
Using the right word or ending instead of the wrong one isn't
pedantry
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Snip]
> Btw, it's "a criterion" - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and
> semantic errors.
I hope one day someone will come along with a pedantry checker. ;-)
--
Tim Hill,
www.timil.com
On 13 May 2008 David J. Ruck wrote:
> Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 13 May 2008 Kevin Wells wrote:
>>
>>> Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has
>>> a spell checker.
>>
>>> Not sure if Edit does.
>>
>> No, it doesn't, but I find spell checkers m
Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13 May 2008 Kevin Wells wrote:
>
> > Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has
> > a spell checker.
>
> > Not sure if Edit does.
>
> No, it doesn't, but I find spell checkers more trouble than they're
> worth.
I find th
On 13 May 2008 Kevin Wells wrote:
> Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has a
> spell checker.
> Not sure if Edit does.
No, it doesn't, but I find spell checkers more trouble than they're
worth.
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 13 May 2008 Paul Vigay wrote:
>
>> I know what would be good
>
>> When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into
>> forms. There are numerous times when I complete a lengthy form and c
On 13 May 2008 Paul Vigay wrote:
> I know what would be good
> When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into
> forms. There are numerous times when I complete a lengthy form and click
> submit, only to find that I've mistyped the captcha or some other error has
> occur
13 matches
Mail list logo
