Tony Moore wrote:
>> In RISC OS, if a directory is copied, its original datestamp is loat,
>> however if a !Runimage is present then the application directory shows
>> the datestamp of the !Runimage, thus preserving the datestamp of the
>> original full-save.
David Pitt wrote on 18 Mar:
> Is this
On 18 Mar 2015, David Pitt wrote:
> Tony Moore, on 18 Mar, wrote:
[snip]
> > In RISC OS, if a directory is copied, its original datestamp is
> > loat, however if a !Runimage is present then the application
> > directory shows the datestamp of the !Runimage, thus preserving the
> > datestamp of t
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:15:07PM +, David Pitt wrote:
> > In RISC OS, if a directory is copied, its original datestamp is loat,
> > however if a !Runimage is present then the application directory shows the
> > datestamp of the !Runimage, thus preserving the datestamp of the original
> > full
Tony Moore, on 18 Mar, wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2015, David Pitt wrote:
> > Rob Kendrick, on 18 Mar, wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > Then this does sound like a bug or omission in HostFS, not NetSurf.
> >
> > It is not a NetSurf bug, it is just a helpful work around for foibles
> > elsewhere.
>
> [only ju
On 18 Mar 2015, David Pitt wrote:
> Rob Kendrick, on 18 Mar, wrote:
[snip]
> > Then this does sound like a bug or omission in HostFS, not NetSurf.
>
> It is not a NetSurf bug, it is just a helpful work around for foibles
> elsewhere.
[only just seen this thread] I was the OP of the feature requ
Rob Kendrick, on 18 Mar, wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:25:41AM +, David Pitt wrote:
> > The underlying issue is how the host treats directory moves, real RISC
> > OS or for exampler SDFS on the Pi, maintains the original date stamp on
> > a move.
> >
> > HostFS on VRPC Mac, RPCEmu Mac a
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:25:41AM +, David Pitt wrote:
> The underlying issue is how the host treats directory moves, real RISC OS or
> for exampler SDFS on the Pi, maintains the original date stamp on a move.
>
> HostFS on VRPC Mac, RPCEmu Mac and VRPC Windows 7 on a directory move assign
>
Rob Kendrick, on 18 Mar, wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:15:30AM +, David Pitt wrote:
> >
> > And it works. Tested on Mac VRPC which does not preserve the directory
> > timestamp on a move.
>
> Ah, is this a bug in VRPC? This would explain a lot.
A bug in VRPC!! How very dare you!
>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:15:30AM +, David Pitt wrote:
>
> And it works. Tested on Mac VRPC which does not preserve the directory
> timestamp on a move.
Ah, is this a bug in VRPC? This would explain a lot. (I've been
experimenting in RPCEmu trying to work out wtf this bug is about;
directo
Vincent Sanders, on 18 Mar, wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:28:45AM +, John Williams wrote:
> >
> > NetSurf changes page says, re #2654:
>
> Had you actually read the commit message in its entirity [1] you would
> have discovered that the text clearly explains wh
In article <20150318085030.gd29...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> Had you actually read the commit message in its entirity [1]
I have now found out how to do this for myself using the link on the
changes page.
Thank you.
John
--
| John Williams
| joh...@ukgateway.net
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:28:45AM +, John Williams wrote:
>
> NetSurf changes page says, re #2654:
Had you actually read the commit message in its entirity [1] you would
have discovered that the text clearly explains why this was done.
It fixes bug #1970 [2] by causing the datest
12 matches
Mail list logo
