Tony Moore, on 18 Mar, wrote: > On 18 Mar 2015, David Pitt <pit...@pittdj.co.uk> wrote: > > Rob Kendrick, on 18 Mar, wrote: > > [snip] > > > > Then this does sound like a bug or omission in HostFS, not NetSurf. > > > > It is not a NetSurf bug, it is just a helpful work around for foibles > > elsewhere. > > [only just seen this thread] I was the OP of the feature request, and did > explain the reasoning there. > > In RISC OS, if a directory is copied, its original datestamp is loat, > however if a !Runimage is present then the application directory shows the > datestamp of the !Runimage, thus preserving the datestamp of the original > full-save.
Is this with VRPC? -- David Pitt
