Re: Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-27 Thread Chris Young
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:55:07 +0200, Ole wrote: > Looks like it is not good to try about:blank. It still has network > access involved: > > >(0.575378) content/fetchers/curl.c fetch_curl_setup 365: fetch > >0x8cd9458, url 'http://www.google.com/favicon.ico' > > Please try about:config. Unlike

Re: Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-26 Thread Ole
Am Sonntag, den 26.08.2012, 11:05 +0200 schrieb Wendell P : Yea, it's still 6s with about:config. Why should fetching the favicon take so long? DNS, network layer setup, network latency... At least it's clear that the first/single network access takes that long. Thanks for reporting it. I

Re: Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-26 Thread Wendell P
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012, at 10:33 AM, Michael Drake wrote: > In article > <853f986283b9fd9996daf9e45b2364b5-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WWVhoA1RWMl5cRUMCX1pYQF8=-webmailer2@s, >Ole wrote: > > >(0.575378) content/fetchers/curl.c fetch_curl_setup 365: fetch > > >0x8cd9458, url 'h

Re: Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-26 Thread Michael Drake
In article <853f986283b9fd9996daf9e45b2364b5-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WWVhoA1RWMl5cRUMCX1pYQF8=-webmailer2@s, Ole wrote: > Looks like it is not good to try about:blank. It still has network > access involved: > >(0.575378) content/fetchers/curl.c fetch_curl_setup 365:

Re: Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-26 Thread Ole
Am Sonntag, den 26.08.2012, 09:19 +0200 schrieb Wendell P : Tried it several times, still 6s. If it helps, while Firefox and Chrome are faster, w3m is also very slow on my machine. Here is "netsurf -v about:blank 2>logfile" Looks like it is not good to try about:blank. It still has networ

Re: Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-26 Thread Wendell P
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012, at 03:48 AM, Michael Drake wrote: > In article > <1345913002.695.140661119461833.719c5...@webmail.messagingengine.com>, > Looks like a 5 second wait for the fetch to start. Perhaps slow DNS. > > As Ole said, please try with a local page. You can use NetSurf's > about:blank

Re: Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-26 Thread Michael Drake
In article <1345913002.695.140661119461833.719c5...@webmail.messagingengine.com>, Wendell P wrote: > (1.119215) content/fetchers/curl.c fetch_curl_setup 365: fetch > 0x9368948, url 'http://www.google.com/' > (6.283815) content/content.c content__init 85: url > file:///usr/share/netsurf/icons/d

Re: Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-26 Thread Ole
Am Samstag, den 25.08.2012, 09:43 +0200 schrieb Wendell P : > On my machine, Chrome and Firefox each take 3s to boot, while Netsurf > takes 6s. Is this typical or do you think there is something wrong? Hello, can you please test with an blank or at least simple *local* webpage? I believe

Re: Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-25 Thread Wendell P
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Chris Young wrote: > On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:09:17 -0700, Wendell P wrote: > > > Netsurf 2.9 Debian distribution on Debian Wheezy. > > > > On my machine, Chrome and Firefox each take 3s to boot, while Netsurf > > takes 6s. Is this typical or do you think there is

Re: Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-24 Thread Chris Young
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:09:17 -0700, Wendell P wrote: > Netsurf 2.9 Debian distribution on Debian Wheezy. > > On my machine, Chrome and Firefox each take 3s to boot, while Netsurf > takes 6s. Is this typical or do you think there is something wrong? Sounds a bit slow. > Also, I sometimes get: >

Performance on Debian Linux

2012-08-24 Thread Wendell P
Netsurf 2.9 Debian distribution on Debian Wheezy. On my machine, Chrome and Firefox each take 3s to boot, while Netsurf takes 6s. Is this typical or do you think there is something wrong? Also, I sometimes get: "Netsurf in running out of memory. Please free some memory and try again." How do y